“Why did you all sacrifice a creature?” I asked.
“Oh, well, he has a Grave Pact out.” Sheldon replied.
Sheldon laughed and pointed to the 8th Edition Grave Pact, which I hadn't recognized. “Did you guys make these decks just to be incredibly complicated?” I asked. “You judges must be a glutton for punishment.”
“Something like that,” said someone. Still, though, looking at the Grave Pact got my brain churning over memories.
A good first impression
The first time that I saw Grave Pact, I knew it was something exciting. Tempest Block was the format of the time, and fighting over resources could be a really big deal. I don't remember if it was Jacob “Danger” Janoska or Brian “World Wanderer” Kowal that finally put it to good use in a deck, but I know that all three of us pounced on it like starving dogs. It initially found its home in a Recurring Nightmare/Survival of the Fittest deck.
That Rec/Sur deck had all of the good traits that a good Grave Pact deck needs (even if it only ran one copy). It ran creatures, obviously, but it also expected them to die. As an added bonus, many of the creatures that it ran came with the added bonus of doing something before it died in the first place. In the best case scenario, I remember an Uktabi Orangutan taking out an artifact, blocking and killing a creature, and then finishing off some other creature when it perished thanks to the Grave Pact. Even if your opponent doesn't let you do this much, it's still capable of allowing this kind of cruelty to happen.
Items to consider when signing onto the Pact
How do I know what is expendable?
Any creature is expendable if your opponent has a creature out, but there are a ton of useful creatures that are also a wee bit more expendable in some fashion. Sometimes these are cards that can sacrifice themselves, hopefully to some useful effect, like a Skirk Prospector or a Cabal Archon. At other times, you're sacrificing a creature and getting something more out of it. Take that Cabal Archon – if you have out a Rotlung Reanimator, for example, you have the ability to turn any Cleric into a triple-punch: stealing four life, making a creature, and with the Grave Pact out, making your opponent sacrifice a creature.
But what if my opponent isn't running many or any creatures?
Well, I still care if my opponent doesn't have creatures!
This is a bit trickier, and requires a bit of dedication. The only thing you can really do is be prepared to give them some creatures. Simply giving them creatures with a Forbidden Orchard isn't that exciting, though. What you're going to want to do is turn their other resources into creatures that they are forced, then, to sacrifice when you lose yours.
The useful word on Grave Pact is “whenever”. “Whenever” is a magical word that signals a trigger is happening. Triggers can be responded to. For the most part, creatureless decks have something in common: they run abundant mass removal. After they've cast a Wrath of God or Hideous Laughter to mess up your plans, a bunch of your creatures will die and place Grave Pact triggers on the stack. At this point, try out a Natural Affinity – you could cast it in response to the mass removal and Armageddon everyone, but why not just have it hit your opponent as a one-way mass land-kill?
Okay, so if they do have creatures, sacking my Mogg Fanatic will totally get ‘em, right?
Not exactly. Sacrificing a Mogg Fanatic or sacking a creature to Phyrexian Plaguelord can be awesome when you don't have the Grave Pact out, but unlike with the Wrath of God trick from up above, here the stack works against you. When you sacrifice the Fanatic, before the ability resolves, they get to sacrifice their creature to the Grave Pact. If you were going to try to kill something, they can just sacrifice that creature before your Fanatic-ping resolves.
There are other ways to compound your sacrifices into more effects. Using a card like Innocent Blood, you can get double duty out of their losses. Mike Flores recently looked at a new card, Promise of Bunrei. With Promise and Grave Pact in play, any sacrifice is going to give you a huge advantage as well as arm you with a whole slew of new little guys that are each willing to take a hit for the team. One other simple way to get more out of lost creatures is to drop a second (or third) Grave Pact. When your opponents are staring down the barrel of a pair of Grave Pacts with a couple of potential sacrifice outlets, even if they have a huge numerical advantage they are going to find themselves in trouble.
So this stack stuff seems to come into play here. What other stack tricks should I pay attention to?
As I mentioned with the Wrath of God/Natural Affinity trick, there is a tiny delay between the Wrath of God resolving and the Grave Pact trigger resolving. You can definitely use this to your advantage. Take a board situation like this: You have out a Phyrexian Plaguelord and a few random rats. They have out a tapped Elvish Piper, more other elves than you have rats, and a pair of big guys (say a Bosh and a Sundering Titan). One Hideous Laughter will first wipe away both of your little guys, and then trigger the Grave Pact, cleaning house on the bigger creatures on the table.
One other clever trick is to have some tool for repeat sacrificing. Using a Corpse Dance, bringing back a Bottle Gnomes to block something, sacrificing it for life, and then forcing them to lose a creature is something that can be done again and again. At least until you run out of mana. Recurring Nightmare and other cards can pull off the same kind of thing, but without the ability to do it as an instant, you can't use it to monkey with the works at an awkward time for your opponent.
One non-stack trick involves collaborative deckbuilding for group games. If your teammates aren't running creatures at all, but you are packed full of creatures, you can make the card completely asymmetrical for your games. Whenever you lose a creature, everyone loses a creature. If, however, your teammates never have anything to lose, the only people that can truly lose out are your opponents.
For your consideration, a monoblack Online-Extended Grave Pact deck.
This deck uses Ravenous Rats and Nezumi Shortfang to get ahead in cards and also to make the other discard that much more potent. While there aren't many rats, Marrow-Gnawer doesn't need much to create a sacrifice engine for the Grave Pact. Phyrexian Plaguelord and Braids are both potentially able to be used for Grave Pact triggers, and also help give the deck a bit more oomph if you haven't drawn the Grave Pact.
There are some other random details about the deck that make it different. Balthor doesn't trigger the Pact when you sacrifice it, but it does bring back any of the creatures you've lost along the way to have another go at it. The three Gods' Eye were put in as another thing to feed to the Braids, and the Patron of the Nezumi is bound to be good if people are losing their permanents to either a Braids, a Grave Pact, or a Phyrexian Plaguelord.
Overall, the deck could go in a couple of different directions. You could turn it into a straight Rat deck, and easily convert it into Standard. The deck could go torward more of a Braids build, and potential include cards like Rotlung Reanimator. You could also squeeze in multiple colors. In Green, for example, you could fit in things like Squirrel Nest, Genesis, or Birds of Paradise. Then again, you could just go crazy like those judges in Philly, and include every complicated rare under the sun that you can get your hands on that will just make the Grave Pact a real head-scratcher for all of your opponents. Whatever you do, it's easy to have fun when you have a Grave Pact on your side of the table.
Before I go, I'd like to tie things off with some feedback (and, yes, Diving_Griffin, the only use for the card is to have an image for us writers to be cutesy with). It looks as though the results of last week's poll are pretty clear. You like a little bit of commentary on what readers have had to say, but for the most part, you are happy with where it is, give or take. Here are some more exacting numbers, for the mathemagician in you.
|In the end of the article wrap-up, do you want to see more reader feedback about the last article, less reader feedback, or about the same?|
|About the same. A little bit here and there is okay by me.||1847||48.6%|
|More feedback. I always like to see a few more ideas!||1235||32.5%|
|Less feedback. No use beating a dead horse.||717||18.9%|
As there always is with previews of the new cards, there was a great deal of traffic in both the forums and in my e-mails. While there were truly a ton of really great ideas that were tossed around in both places, two, I think, deserve a bigger spotlight. In the forums, MavrikGandalf was the first to bring up Ire of Kaminari, beating out my e-mail box by a wide margin. There is probably a place for an Ire of Kaminari-Cloudhoof Kirin deck in the new Standard, I'd wager. The Kirin makes it very easy to have a much fuller grave, and it is also markedly easier to hit an Ire for 12 or even 16 than it is for 20.
Horobi's Whisper also drummed up a number of e-mails and more than a few mentions in the forums, but the person that expounded about it the most (and mayhaps the best) to me was probably my friend Ben Dempsey. I will paraphrase him:
One of the really interesting ideas with Horobi's Whisper was to pair it with Dampen Thought so that you can effectively Whisper until you're out of a deck. The problem with this is that you're never really planning on actually using that Dampen Thought to deck them, and you still need to both find Thoughts and have something to splice it onto. With a Kirin, you have a kill condition that naturally feeds your graveyard to make the Whisper good.
That Dempsey is a smart man. Not only did he make my favorite Extended deck of last season (the so-called “Temporary Solution”), but he's also a great guy to run into out on the town! Thanks to Ben and to everyone else who had something to say about the Cloudhoof Kirin.
In a couple of weeks, I'm going to try something a bit different. We've had plenty of Reader Challenges, and long-time readers are well aware of how that format works: I write about a card and in the next column, I go over the best decks with that card that you've all made out of the masses of decklists that reach my inbox.
- The deck need not be focused on using the card, but it does use it well
- The way the deck uses the card shows off the card
- You include some comments as to why you chose that aspect of the card
- If you do include numerous decks, they show off different things
- Be original! The more interesting the deck is, the more likely it is to get showcased
- The early bird gets the worm – ties go to early submitters
Our newly returned Content Manager (back from paternity leave) had suggested a change-up like this some time ago, and I thought it would be worth seeing how it went now that he's back. I'll be sure to remind you all in the coming weeks about the upcoming Tortured Existence Challenge, but don't give away too many of your ideas to the other readers unless you want to see their decks up in the column instead of yours!
Have a great rest of the week!