| Rank | Player | Points | Op.Win% |
| 1 | Yuliadinata, Dennis | 30 | 71.10% |
| 2 | Chan, Shih Chien | 27 | 75.35% |
| 3 | Ishida, Itaru | 27 | 72.61% |
| 4 | Tamber, Tobey | 27 | 68.80% |
| 5 | Gao, Zhen Xing | 25 | 73.92% |
| 6 | Komuro, Shuu | 25 | 69.52% |
| 7 | Nishino, Kenta | 25 | 66.66% |
| 8 | Law, Albertus | 25 | 66.13% |
| 9 | Shimura, Ichirou | 25 | 65.95% |
| 10 | Kang, Gabriel * | 25 | 56.17% |
| 11 | Soh, Joe | 24 | 76.66% |
| 12 | Phang, Kok Fai * | 24 | 75.71% |
| 13 | Yeung, Sin Kit * | 24 | 75.35% |
| 14 | Lee, Wen Yi * | 24 | 72.85% |
| 15 | Teeradechsakul, Teerachai | 24 | 71.07% |
| 16 | Yamada, Tsutomu | 24 | 69.52% |
| 17 | Asahara, Akira | 24 | 68.92% |
| 18 | Oks, Oliver | 24 | 68.12% |
| 19 | lin, mingyi * | 24 | 66.50% |
| 20 | Yasooka, Shouta | 24 | 65.99% |
| 21 | Leong, Felix | 24 | 65.25% |
| 22 | Chang, Yu-Jen | 24 | 64.68% |
| 23 | Lam, Joe Cho Yiu * | 23 | 72.85% |
| 24 | Mitsuya, Kazuhiko | 23 | 68.80% |
| 25 | Lee, Keng Yin * | 23 | 59.08% |
| 26 | Kuo, Tzu Ching | 22 | 74.04% |
| 27 | Arita, Ryuuichi | 22 | 71.22% |
| 28 | Woo, Benjamin Lik Kang * | 22 | 70.93% |
| 29 | Sasagawa, Tomohide | 22 | 67.83% |
| 30 | Zen, Quentin * | 22 | 66.49% |
| 31 | maneechareonwong, prapon | 22 | 65.18% |
| 32 | Yap, Jing Yang | 22 | 64.50% |
| 33 | Sim, Wee Yi * | 22 | 64.37% |
| 34 | Ang, Junyang | 22 | 63.37% |
| 35 | Saito, Tomoharu | 22 | 62.03% |
| 36 | Krish, Rondy * | 22 | 61.77% |
| 37 | Takeshita, Tooru | 21 | 73.33% |
| 38 | Kuan, Khang Jong | 21 | 70.54% |
| 39 | Ong, Kok Seng | 21 | 68.26% |
| 40 | Huang, Stephen Wen Liang * | 21 | 68.14% |
| 41 | Oiso, Masashi | 21 | 66.61% |
| 42 | Lin, Milton Jian Xiong | 21 | 66.49% |
| 43 | Chua, Wei xiang * | 21 | 66.07% |
| 44 | Kiwanont, Sukhum | 21 | 65.89% |
| 45 | Fujita, Tsuyoshi | 21 | 64.89% |
| 46 | Mori, Katsuhiro | 21 | 64.52% |
| 47 | Tsumura, Kenji | 21 | 64.28% |
| 48 | Lee, Ju-Min * | 21 | 64.04% |
| 49 | Liu, Yi-liu | 21 | 63.69% |
| 50 | Ogura, Ryou | 21 | 63.28% |
| 51 | Noel, Neo Yong Ling Amrith * | 20 | 67.46% |
| 52 | Chua, Chang | 20 | 65.95% |
| 53 | Kataoka, Asami * | 19 | 72.38% |
| 54 | Au Yong, Wai Kin | 19 | 67.85% |
| 55 | Tan, Steve Wei Quan | 19 | 67.18% |
| 56 | Salvin, Jean Charles | 19 | 66.29% |
| 57 | Kong, Chong Teng * | 19 | 61.75% |
| 58 | Loh, Mun Kit * | 19 | 61.25% |
| 59 | Fujita, Osamu | 18 | 67.95% |
| 60 | Takeda, Hiroki * | 18 | 67.18% |
| 61 | Hwang, Chi-Chung | 18 | 66.30% |
| 62 | Azuma, Motokiyo | 18 | 66.30% |
| 63 | Cai, ShaoKen * | 18 | 62.97% |
| 64 | Lau, Zhao Zhi * | 18 | 62.32% |
| 65 | Ong, Weiwah * | 18 | 61.73% |
| 66 | Morita, Masahiko | 18 | 61.66% |
| 67 | Law, Charles Chang Teck | 18 | 61.30% |
| 68 | Zhou, Yujian | 18 | 58.92% |
| 69 | Kim, Min Soo | 18 | 58.33% |
| 70 | Lim, Yong Hui Ivan | 18 | 56.25% |
| 71 | Su, Michael * | 18 | 56.25% |
| 72 | tan, gary Gui Ping | 18 | 55.35% |
| 73 | Subari, Anthony * | 18 | 52.45% |
| 74 | Lim, Tzer Chern * | 18 | 52.24% |
| 75 | Yeh, Chao Lung | 18 | 44.79% |
| 76 | Ng, Wei San | 17 | 60.87% |
| 77 | Yuen, Kwan Ching | 16 | 77.38% |
| 78 | Osawa, Takuya | 16 | 70.83% |
| 79 | Chai, Ming Huang Royce | 16 | 68.75% |
| 80 | Shiozu, Ryouma | 16 | 65.97% |
| 81 | Jiang, Yixiang | 16 | 64.58% |
| 82 | Yoo, Ki Hyun * | 16 | 64.16% |
| 83 | Tung, Chang-Ming | 16 | 63.60% |
| 84 | Soh, Terry | 16 | 62.50% |
| 85 | Eng, Sam Ching Seng * | 16 | 61.94% |
| 86 | Gong, Di Hui | 16 | 60.71% |
| 87 | Goh, Kenneth Han Ming * | 16 | 59.37% |
| 88 | Ng, Eric Jun Feng * | 16 | 59.07% |
| 89 | Tsai, Ming Da | 16 | 58.57% |
| 90 | Ng, Chong Leng * | 16 | 58.33% |
| 91 | masaya, Kitayama * | 16 | 57.63% |
| 92 | Yap, Jason Kok Sang * | 16 | 55.20% |
| 93 | Lu, Shufeng * | 16 | 53.19% |
| 94 | Shimoji, Ai | 16 | 53.00% |
| 95 | Chandra, Edy * | 16 | 50.32% |
| 96 | fong, clement yu Mun * | 16 | 49.70% |
| 97 | Sun, Jiafeng * | 16 | 45.31% |
| 98 | choo, yong han * | 15 | 77.08% |
| 99 | Phanpakorn, Dolpipop * | 15 | 76.66% |
| 100 | Kaji, Tomohiro | 15 | 73.92% |
| 101 | Suwansunthorn, Pluet * | 15 | 70.13% |
| 102 | Ng, Kay Seong * | 15 | 69.81% |
| 103 | Pek, Cheng Wee | 15 | 69.44% |
| 104 | Chang, Chih-Hsiang | 15 | 68.33% |
| 105 | Mun Yip, Yau | 15 | 68.33% |
| 106 | Chun, Bo Ruad | 15 | 67.77% |
| 107 | Sirilertvorakul, Veerapat | 15 | 67.59% |
| 108 | Hung, Chi Hang * | 15 | 67.50% |
| 109 | Koh, Matthew Hong En * | 15 | 66.86% |
| 110 | Sundarakalin, Punthorn * | 15 | 66.66% |
| 111 | Yong Keat, Lee * | 15 | 65.83% |
| 112 | Leong, Ding Yuan | 15 | 65.35% |
| 113 | Tan, Steven | 15 | 63.92% |
| 114 | Zhong, Wei Wen * | 15 | 63.77% |
| 115 | Thio, Russell | 15 | 63.52% |
| 116 | Bai, Mingzhi * | 15 | 63.02% |
| 117 | Vasu, Vivian | 15 | 60.83% |
| 118 | Ng, Soon Lye | 15 | 60.11% |
| 119 | Lim, Tae-hyun * | 15 | 60.09% |
| 120 | Hendrawan, Bernhard * | 15 | 58.75% |
| 121 | Wong, Chi Ming * | 15 | 58.70% |
| 122 | Ong, Desmond Wei Liang * | 15 | 57.81% |
| 123 | Eide, Sterling Ellis * | 15 | 57.08% |
| 124 | Ibamoto, Masami | 15 | 56.94% |
| 125 | Zee, Way Leong | 15 | 55.97% |
| 126 | Tay, Yong Wei Ralph * | 15 | 55.89% |
| 127 | Huang, Benjamin | 15 | 55.55% |
| 128 | Soh, Weng Heng | 15 | 55.35% |
| 129 | Tan, Jasper Ming Yuan * | 15 | 55.20% |
| 130 | Götz, Patrick * | 15 | 54.94% |
| 131 | Lim, Ernest | 15 | 54.59% |
| 132 | Gan, Huai Shi * | 15 | 54.16% |
| 133 | Tan, Chin Heng * | 15 | 53.64% |
| 134 | Chan, Bernard Hock Keong | 15 | 53.47% |
| 135 | Eurkittiroj, Arthit * | 15 | 52.60% |
| 136 | tan, xingyong * | 15 | 51.78% |
| 137 | Yu, Mingyi * | 15 | 51.04% |
| 138 | Punpuing, Paopun * | 15 | 50.92% |
| 139 | Kok, Kim Yin | 15 | 50.79% |
| 140 | Lee, Jason Lay Boon | 15 | 49.62% |
| 141 | Wong, Lucas * | 15 | 49.33% |
| 142 | Chong, Yi Da * | 15 | 47.91% |
| 143 | Yu, Zhaowei * | 15 | 45.83% |
| 144 | Sutthisakorn, Channarong * | 15 | 44.79% |
| 145 | Soh, Chia Xiong * | 15 | 44.27% |
| 146 | Koh, Chong Yew Edwin * | 15 | 42.70% |
| 147 | Ng, Kay Wee * | 15 | 36.97% |
| 148 | Lim, Chen Foong * | 14 | 67.26% |
| 149 | Matousek, Pavel | 14 | 66.66% |
| 150 | Orsuwan, Sutthisak * | 14 | 43.25% |
| 151 | Jirapongtrakul, Boonchai | 13 | 76.19% |
| 152 | Kong, Yeunjin * | 13 | 70.00% |
| 153 | Lee, Sang-ryeol | 13 | 69.44% |
| 154 | pak, matthew * | 13 | 69.16% |
| 155 | Ho, Maximilian * | 13 | 68.33% |
| 156 | Song, Hua chao | 13 | 65.27% |
| 157 | Iskandar, Nik * | 13 | 65.00% |
| 158 | Gan, vincent Wai Kuan | 13 | 63.09% |
| 159 | Imai, Kimio | 13 | 61.80% |
| 160 | Goh, Johnson * | 13 | 57.98% |
| 161 | Teo, Yi Chiang | 13 | 56.94% |
| 162 | Yang, Joshua | 13 | 56.07% |
| 163 | Vogin, Willy * | 13 | 54.16% |
| 164 | Ang, Wei Tiong * | 13 | 53.27% |
| 165 | Chen, Yenh-Hau | 13 | 52.38% |
| 166 | lee, timothy * | 13 | 49.85% |
| 167 | Pang, Kelvin Goo Xiang | 13 | 49.65% |
| 168 | Uttisen, Patwikorn * | 13 | 46.35% |
| 169 | pang, edwin Tian Xiang * | 13 | 45.28% |
| 170 | Wong, Choon Hong Ronald * | 13 | 44.27% |
| 171 | Teo, Justin * | 13 | 44.27% |
| 172 | Sim, Chun Hung Anthony * | 13 | 44.12% |
| 173 | Yung, Yung * | 13 | 41.14% |
| 174 | Hao, Feng * | 13 | 40.62% |
| 175 | ponlasint, suntee * | 12 | 80.83% |
| 176 | Khoo, Aik Seng | 12 | 73.57% |
| 177 | Wong, Freddy Chun Sung * | 12 | 70.00% |
| 178 | Lau, Sam Lei Kang | 12 | 69.52% |
| 179 | Li, Jie | 12 | 66.66% |
| 180 | Leong, Joseph Kin Seng * | 12 | 64.96% |
| 181 | Lau, Wilfred * | 12 | 64.89% |
| 182 | li, fabien Yi * | 12 | 64.43% |
| 183 | Nakamura, Shuuhei | 12 | 64.28% |
| 184 | Chan, Qin Liang * | 12 | 62.92% |
| 185 | Goh, Sean Luke * | 12 | 61.68% |
| 186 | Lin, Ming Shian * | 12 | 60.75% |
| 187 | xu, su | 12 | 58.92% |
| 188 | Lin, Ruizi * | 12 | 58.33% |
| 189 | Chong, Fong Kai * | 12 | 57.81% |
| 190 | Lee, Jin Hui Edmund * | 12 | 57.41% |
| 191 | Tay, Yi Lu * | 12 | 57.29% |
| 192 | Ahmad, Jufri * | 12 | 57.08% |
| 193 | Yeo, Lee Chye * | 12 | 56.90% |
| 194 | Chia, Bing Hong * | 12 | 56.73% |
| 195 | Xiao, Dennis Ting Bin * | 12 | 55.20% |
| 196 | Loh, Ryan * | 12 | 55.05% |
| 197 | Pong, Robin Hee Tee | 12 | 54.93% |
| 198 | Chan, ZhongHan Jonathan * | 12 | 54.73% |
| 199 | Gwee, Hong Kiat Kenneth * | 12 | 54.68% |
| 200 | Zhang, Tian Hao * | 12 | 54.68% |
| 201 | Ching, Yu Jun Jonathan * | 12 | 54.68% |
| 202 | Lim, Guan Ling David * | 12 | 54.47% |
| 203 | Dayag, Henry * | 12 | 54.42% |
| 204 | Wong Pu Siong, Alex * | 12 | 54.10% |
| 205 | Chung, Ian Wai Ming * | 12 | 54.01% |
| 206 | Hung, Hsun Hao * | 12 | 53.47% |
| 207 | Phungprachit, Pulperm * | 12 | 53.43% |
| 208 | Teo, Boon Peng * | 12 | 53.06% |
| 209 | Hiu, Choon Pien * | 12 | 52.60% |
| 210 | Wong, Samson | 12 | 52.08% |
| 211 | Wu, Sebestian * | 12 | 51.78% |
| 212 | Hio, Man Tung Lester * | 12 | 51.56% |
| 213 | Loh, Chuan Han | 12 | 51.38% |
| 214 | Ng, Jun Yuan * | 12 | 51.19% |
| 215 | Ng, Gene Jian Jie * | 12 | 50.52% |
| 216 | Tong, Jing Yao * | 12 | 50.37% |
| 217 | Eng, Boon Tat Elvin | 12 | 48.41% |
| 218 | Chan, Weng Cheong Samuel * | 12 | 47.76% |
| 219 | Chai, Minji * | 12 | 46.72% |
| 220 | Ng, bob Yeong Siang * | 12 | 45.31% |
| 221 | Yong, Woei * | 12 | 45.31% |
| 222 | Lim, Jun Guang Wilfred * | 12 | 44.80% |
| 223 | Hendriks Franssen, Sven * | 12 | 43.75% |
| 224 | Koh, Shao Hong * | 12 | 43.71% |
| 225 | Yee, Chin Keng * | 12 | 43.60% |
| 226 | Chong, Qi Da * | 12 | 43.54% |
| 227 | Tan, Han Nygel * | 12 | 41.66% |
| 228 | Wu, JunYu * | 12 | 41.66% |
| 229 | Ong, Wei Bin * | 12 | 39.68% |
| 230 | Neo, Alvin Wee Kian * | 12 | 38.33% |
| 231 | Yap, Marcus * | 12 | 37.50% |
| 232 | Kiu, Si Wei Desmond * | 11 | 57.59% |
| 233 | Goh, Chris Si Wei * | 11 | 55.20% |
| 234 | Starrs, Sean * | 11 | 52.60% |
| 235 | Wang, Sim Loong | 11 | 51.11% |
| 236 | Wong, Nicholas Jonathan | 10 | 62.03% |
| 237 | Zhang, Qun * | 10 | 61.90% |
| 238 | Gan, Chun Fung * | 10 | 58.88% |
| 239 | Potter, Michael * | 10 | 57.40% |
| 240 | Piamrasri, Chomron * | 10 | 57.29% |
| 241 | Lam, chi kwong * | 10 | 57.29% |
| 242 | Cher, Chin Wee | 10 | 54.62% |
| 243 | Ng, Benson * | 10 | 51.95% |
| 244 | Toh, woon Seong * | 10 | 50.52% |
| 245 | Lim, Swee Weng * | 10 | 50.45% |
| 246 | Lim, Sidney Ming Han Reube * | 10 | 50.18% |
| 247 | Loh, Martin * | 10 | 48.95% |
| 248 | Schuette, Soeren * | 10 | 48.14% |
| 249 | Chai, Eng Chye * | 10 | 47.04% |
| 250 | Lin, Yi Chao * | 10 | 44.96% |
| 251 | Siagian, Yohannes | 10 | 44.12% |
| 252 | Chen, SiHao * | 10 | 40.62% |
| 253 | Chen, Quan Sheng * | 10 | 38.54% |
| 254 | Li, Cheuk Yin * | 9 | 72.22% |
| 255 | Wang, Tian | 9 | 71.11% |
| 256 | Jen, Chien-Ming | 9 | 67.85% |
| 257 | Watabe, Naoto * | 9 | 66.66% |
| 258 | Gaku, Hasegawa * | 9 | 66.42% |
| 259 | Koo, Andy * | 9 | 59.37% |
| 260 | Kwan, David Wei Phang | 9 | 59.25% |
| 261 | Tan, David Boon Leong * | 9 | 59.25% |
| 262 | chia, edmund * | 9 | 58.33% |
| 263 | Ching, Jian Hong * | 9 | 57.60% |
| 264 | Teo, kaiwen * | 9 | 57.40% |
| 265 | Loh, Wei Wen * | 9 | 56.66% |
| 266 | Chua, Boon Kiat James * | 9 | 56.46% |
| 267 | Chung, Villien Yaw Fui * | 9 | 55.59% |
| 268 | Ho, Yong Jian * | 9 | 54.81% |
| 269 | Chua, David | 9 | 54.44% |
| 270 | Ching, Chao Chyvn Charles * | 9 | 53.49% |
| 271 | Kwek, Alfie * | 9 | 52.77% |
| 272 | Ryo, Takada * | 9 | 52.60% |
| 273 | Ong, Wei Kuan * | 9 | 51.56% |
| 274 | Rosmarudin, Md Faizal Bin * | 9 | 51.35% |
| 275 | Lim, Ke You * | 9 | 50.59% |
| 276 | Koh, Zhi-Ti Jason * | 9 | 50.31% |
| 277 | Neo, Jarred Chye Heng * | 9 | 50.17% |
| 278 | Neo, Benjamin * | 9 | 50.00% |
| 279 | Lim, Leslie * | 9 | 50.00% |
| 280 | su, Jee-hung * | 9 | 47.76% |
| 281 | Wong, Hon Choon * | 9 | 47.40% |
| 282 | Neo, Hong Zhi * | 9 | 47.39% |
| 283 | Gan, Jonathan Zheng Sheng * | 9 | 47.22% |
| 284 | Foong, WenJun * | 9 | 46.87% |
| 285 | Sng, Kim Guan * | 9 | 46.66% |
| 286 | Kuek, Hong Feng Adrian * | 9 | 45.83% |
| 287 | Lim, Shi Cheng James * | 9 | 45.37% |
| 288 | Chua, Rodger Meng Wan * | 9 | 45.31% |
| 289 | Poh, Ming Jie Audric * | 9 | 44.79% |
| 290 | Tan, Kek Chin * | 9 | 43.40% |
| 291 | Ng, Chin Pin * | 9 | 43.24% |
| 292 | Bay, Ee Yong Dennis * | 9 | 43.02% |
| 293 | Wong, Ming Fook * | 9 | 42.36% |
| 294 | Chong, Yu Terng Aidrich * | 9 | 42.18% |
| 295 | Cho, Zheng Heng * | 9 | 38.33% |
| 296 | Yeo, Melvin * | 8 | 53.70% |
| 297 | Wu, Yang San * | 8 | 45.37% |
| 298 | Puri, Karan * | 8 | 44.61% |
| 299 | Loo, Ching Siong * | 7 | 50.00% |
| 300 | Low, Kah Yuan * | 7 | 49.47% |
| 301 | Tan, Wei Sau Johnathan * | 7 | 48.97% |
| 302 | Ng, Wai Kwong Victor * | 7 | 44.55% |
| 303 | Tan, Eng Giap * | 7 | 43.60% |
| 304 | cheong, Kevin * | 7 | 43.45% |
| 305 | Toy, WenDa * | 7 | 42.36% |
| 306 | Teo, Chun Min * | 7 | 42.17% |
| 307 | Soon, Kenny * | 7 | 41.84% |
| 308 | Nyew, Yee Leong * | 7 | 41.33% |
| 309 | Emuang, Bradley Keith * | 7 | 37.96% |
| 310 | Soon Kuan, Saw | 6 | 66.66% |
| 311 | Tjandra, Miki * | 6 | 62.58% |
| 312 | Chan, Boon Hao * | 6 | 58.33% |
| 313 | Seow, Chun Jie * | 6 | 57.40% |
| 314 | Wong, Jeff * | 6 | 57.33% |
| 315 | Woo, Chung Leong Jason * | 6 | 54.68% |
| 316 | gan, meng san * | 6 | 54.16% |
| 317 | Tan, Han Lin * | 6 | 53.33% |
| 318 | Ho, Ming Gen * | 6 | 52.96% |
| 319 | Tan, Victor * | 6 | 52.77% |
| 320 | Fan, Kah Ping Nelson * | 6 | 50.92% |
| 321 | Effendi, Yopi | 6 | 50.66% |
| 322 | Huang, Spencer * | 6 | 50.66% |
| 323 | Kang, Wei Xiong * | 6 | 50.00% |
| 324 | Goh, Yong Xin * | 6 | 49.33% |
| 325 | Okada, Kou | 6 | 49.33% |
| 326 | Tse, Desmond * | 6 | 46.98% |
| 327 | Torres, Danielle Paul * | 6 | 46.87% |
| 328 | Li, HongZeng Kelvin * | 6 | 46.66% |
| 329 | Hartanto, Victor * | 6 | 46.66% |
| 330 | Tan, Kah Wei * | 6 | 45.57% |
| 331 | Chen, Yun Xiang * | 6 | 45.31% |
| 332 | Chan, Zhi Hung * | 6 | 45.17% |
| 333 | Kim, Cynic * | 6 | 43.51% |
| 334 | Lai, Yong Sheng * | 6 | 43.22% |
| 335 | Tan, Wee Cheng * | 6 | 41.66% |
| 336 | Chong, David Tian Wei * | 6 | 40.99% |
| 337 | Toh, Qing Yao * | 6 | 39.16% |
| 338 | Tan, Wee Meng * | 6 | 38.85% |
| 339 | Sutanto, Hendrew * | 6 | 36.25% |
| 340 | Tiong, Joe * | 5 | 42.66% |
| 341 | Widjaja, Rudy | 4 | 58.33% |
| 342 | Tan, Chee Chong * | 4 | 45.37% |
| 343 | Ang, Dun Jiu * | 4 | 44.44% |
| 344 | Dwiputra, Arifirawan * | 4 | 41.33% |
| 345 | Neo, Wee Kang Daniel * | 4 | 40.10% |
| 346 | Pek, Dennis Sik Haam * | 3 | 62.50% |
| 347 | Ng, Wei Lee | 3 | 60.41% |
| 348 | Tan, Kiat Cheong * | 3 | 58.33% |
| 349 | Li, chi lung * | 3 | 58.33% |
| 350 | Mogi, Ray * | 3 | 58.33% |
| 351 | Rangsan, Janrangsee * | 3 | 53.33% |
| 352 | Riphat, Aziz * | 3 | 50.00% |
| 353 | Liew, Gabriel Wei Sheng * | 3 | 47.22% |
| 354 | New, Chee Wee * | 3 | 45.83% |
| 355 | Tan, Kah Beng * | 3 | 45.37% |
| 356 | Tan, Wee Cher * | 3 | 44.64% |
| 357 | Ang, Joo Chuan Jilson * | 3 | 44.00% |
| 358 | Chong, Daniel Tian Nian * | 3 | 42.70% |
| 359 | Goh, Kian Hou Gerald * | 3 | 40.00% |
| 360 | Hon, Chun Wah * | 3 | 39.79% |
| 361 | Kee, Zhen Hui * | 3 | 38.88% |
| 362 | Tan, Jinn Yeong Kelvin * | 3 | 38.09% |
| 363 | Goh, Wee Teck Jerry * | 3 | 37.50% |
| 364 | Lee, Guan Heng * | 1 | 47.91% |
| 365 | Weng, Rong Can * | 1 | 42.66% |
| 366 | Bai, Yixiang * | 1 | 37.50% |
| 367 | Salleh, Fuad * | 0 | 100.00% |
| 368 | Lin, WeiDe * | 0 | 55.55% |
| 369 | Ooi, Wei Jie Andrew * | 0 | 44.44% |
| 370 | Goh, Wu Chong * | 0 | 42.66% |
| 371 | Tan, Keng Wee Samuel * | 0 | 41.66% |
| 372 | Lin, Rui Feng * | 0 | 41.66% |
Articles