| Rank | Player | Points | Op.Win% |
| 1 | Gao, Zhen Xing | 21 | 77.38% |
| 2 | Tamber, Tobey | 21 | 74.60% |
| 3 | Ishida, Itaru | 21 | 71.42% |
| 4 | Yuliadinata, Dennis | 21 | 68.57% |
| 5 | lin, mingyi * | 21 | 64.62% |
| 6 | Lam, Joe Cho Yiu * | 19 | 76.19% |
| 7 | Arita, Ryuuichi | 19 | 71.42% |
| 8 | Nishino, Kenta | 19 | 65.07% |
| 9 | Kong, Chong Teng * | 19 | 58.50% |
| 10 | Phang, Kok Fai * | 18 | 82.14% |
| 11 | Soh, Joe | 18 | 79.76% |
| 12 | Kuo, Tzu Ching | 18 | 78.57% |
| 13 | Yeung, Sin Kit * | 18 | 78.57% |
| 14 | Yamada, Tsutomu | 18 | 76.19% |
| 15 | Chan, Shih Chien | 18 | 75.00% |
| 16 | Lee, Wen Yi * | 18 | 75.00% |
| 17 | Kataoka, Asami * | 18 | 75.00% |
| 18 | Takeshita, Tooru | 18 | 75.00% |
| 19 | Oks, Oliver | 18 | 71.42% |
| 20 | Law, Albertus | 18 | 71.42% |
| 21 | Takeda, Hiroki * | 18 | 70.95% |
| 22 | Kuan, Khang Jong | 18 | 69.04% |
| 23 | Asahara, Akira | 18 | 67.85% |
| 24 | Sasagawa, Tomohide | 18 | 66.66% |
| 25 | Lee, Ju-Min * | 18 | 64.62% |
| 26 | Shimura, Ichirou | 18 | 64.28% |
| 27 | Salvin, Jean Charles | 18 | 63.88% |
| 28 | Huang, Stephen Wen Liang * | 18 | 63.09% |
| 29 | Leong, Felix | 18 | 62.58% |
| 30 | Ang, Junyang | 18 | 61.90% |
| 31 | Krish, Rondy * | 18 | 60.95% |
| 32 | Zhou, Yujian | 18 | 55.15% |
| 33 | Loh, Mun Kit * | 18 | 54.08% |
| 34 | Kang, Gabriel * | 18 | 54.08% |
| 35 | Hwang, Chi-Chung | 17 | 73.80% |
| 36 | Noel, Neo Yong Ling Amrith * | 17 | 71.03% |
| 37 | Mori, Katsuhiro | 17 | 66.66% |
| 38 | Yuen, Kwan Ching | 16 | 79.76% |
| 39 | Woo, Benjamin Lik Kang * | 16 | 75.23% |
| 40 | Chai, Ming Huang Royce | 16 | 73.33% |
| 41 | Mitsuya, Kazuhiko | 16 | 72.61% |
| 42 | Komuro, Shuu | 16 | 69.04% |
| 43 | Au Yong, Wai Kin | 16 | 67.85% |
| 44 | Shiozu, Ryouma | 16 | 66.66% |
| 45 | Chua, Chang | 16 | 65.47% |
| 46 | Soh, Terry | 16 | 65.47% |
| 47 | Tan, Chuen Hwa | 16 | 65.07% |
| 48 | Saito, Tomoharu | 16 | 63.80% |
| 49 | Yap, Jing Yang | 16 | 62.03% |
| 50 | maneechareonwong, prapon | 16 | 61.90% |
| 51 | Tung, Chang-Ming | 16 | 60.71% |
| 52 | Ng, Chong Leng * | 16 | 57.93% |
| 53 | Lee, Keng Yin * | 16 | 57.82% |
| 54 | masaya, Kitayama * | 16 | 55.71% |
| 55 | Yap, Jason Kok Sang * | 16 | 53.74% |
| 56 | Lu, Shufeng * | 16 | 51.02% |
| 57 | fong, clement yu Mun * | 16 | 47.27% |
| 58 | choo, yong han * | 15 | 80.00% |
| 59 | Tan, Steve Wei Quan | 15 | 77.14% |
| 60 | Phanpakorn, Dolpipop * | 15 | 76.19% |
| 61 | Chang, Chih-Hsiang | 15 | 75.00% |
| 62 | Teeradechsakul, Teerachai | 15 | 75.00% |
| 63 | Kaji, Tomohiro | 15 | 75.00% |
| 64 | Mun Yip, Yau | 15 | 73.21% |
| 65 | Suwansunthorn, Pluet * | 15 | 71.90% |
| 66 | Ong, Kok Seng | 15 | 71.42% |
| 67 | Lin, Milton Jian Xiong | 15 | 71.42% |
| 68 | Zen, Quentin * | 15 | 71.42% |
| 69 | Kiwanont, Sukhum | 15 | 70.47% |
| 70 | Ng, Kay Seong * | 15 | 69.84% |
| 71 | Ogura, Ryou | 15 | 69.64% |
| 72 | Chua, Wei xiang * | 15 | 69.64% |
| 73 | Pek, Cheng Wee | 15 | 69.52% |
| 74 | Oiso, Masashi | 15 | 69.04% |
| 75 | Koh, Matthew Hong En * | 15 | 68.78% |
| 76 | Yasooka, Shouta | 15 | 68.57% |
| 77 | Sirilertvorakul, Veerapat | 15 | 68.25% |
| 78 | Fujita, Osamu | 15 | 67.85% |
| 79 | Tsumura, Kenji | 15 | 67.85% |
| 80 | Liu, Yi-liu | 15 | 67.85% |
| 81 | Azuma, Motokiyo | 15 | 67.46% |
| 82 | Lau, Zhao Zhi * | 15 | 67.34% |
| 83 | Sim, Wee Yi * | 15 | 67.14% |
| 84 | Chang, Yu-Jen | 15 | 66.66% |
| 85 | Hung, Chi Hang * | 15 | 66.07% |
| 86 | Kim, Min Soo | 15 | 65.47% |
| 87 | Fujita, Tsuyoshi | 15 | 65.47% |
| 88 | Leong, Ding Yuan | 15 | 64.28% |
| 89 | Chun, Bo Ruad | 15 | 63.88% |
| 90 | Bai, Mingzhi * | 15 | 63.26% |
| 91 | Law, Charles Chang Teck | 15 | 62.69% |
| 92 | Ng, Soon Lye | 15 | 62.69% |
| 93 | Vasu, Vivian | 15 | 62.50% |
| 94 | Morita, Masahiko | 15 | 61.90% |
| 95 | Cai, ShaoKen * | 15 | 61.67% |
| 96 | Zhong, Wei Wen * | 15 | 61.11% |
| 97 | Tan, Steven | 15 | 60.71% |
| 98 | Ong, Weiwah * | 15 | 60.31% |
| 99 | Su, Michael * | 15 | 58.84% |
| 100 | tan, gary Gui Ping | 15 | 57.93% |
| 101 | Hendrawan, Bernhard * | 15 | 56.74% |
| 102 | Lim, Yong Hui Ivan | 15 | 56.66% |
| 103 | Eide, Sterling Ellis * | 15 | 56.39% |
| 104 | Wong, Chi Ming * | 15 | 55.78% |
| 105 | Chan, Bernard Hock Keong | 15 | 53.80% |
| 106 | Ibamoto, Masami | 15 | 52.38% |
| 107 | Götz, Patrick * | 15 | 51.90% |
| 108 | Lim, Ernest | 15 | 50.39% |
| 109 | Subari, Anthony * | 15 | 50.00% |
| 110 | Eurkittiroj, Arthit * | 15 | 50.00% |
| 111 | Lim, Tzer Chern * | 15 | 49.25% |
| 112 | Yeh, Chao Lung | 15 | 47.61% |
| 113 | Wong, Lucas * | 15 | 43.87% |
| 114 | Lim, Chen Foong * | 14 | 69.04% |
| 115 | Matousek, Pavel | 14 | 66.66% |
| 116 | Ng, Wei San | 14 | 62.69% |
| 117 | Jirapongtrakul, Boonchai | 13 | 76.19% |
| 118 | pak, matthew * | 13 | 75.00% |
| 119 | Song, Hua chao | 13 | 74.28% |
| 120 | Osawa, Takuya | 13 | 73.33% |
| 121 | Lee, Sang-ryeol | 13 | 71.42% |
| 122 | Jiang, Yixiang | 13 | 70.74% |
| 123 | Iskandar, Nik * | 13 | 70.23% |
| 124 | Kong, Yeunjin * | 13 | 70.23% |
| 125 | Imai, Kimio | 13 | 69.52% |
| 126 | Yoo, Ki Hyun * | 13 | 69.04% |
| 127 | Gan, vincent Wai Kuan | 13 | 66.66% |
| 128 | Gong, Di Hui | 13 | 65.47% |
| 129 | Ng, Eric Jun Feng * | 13 | 65.30% |
| 130 | Eng, Sam Ching Seng * | 13 | 63.88% |
| 131 | Tsai, Ming Da | 13 | 61.90% |
| 132 | Goh, Kenneth Han Ming * | 13 | 60.54% |
| 133 | Goh, Johnson * | 13 | 59.63% |
| 134 | Vogin, Willy * | 13 | 55.15% |
| 135 | Shimoji, Ai | 13 | 54.53% |
| 136 | Ang, Wei Tiong * | 13 | 51.11% |
| 137 | Chandra, Edy * | 13 | 48.07% |
| 138 | Pang, Kelvin Goo Xiang | 13 | 47.05% |
| 139 | Sun, Jiafeng * | 13 | 44.21% |
| 140 | ponlasint, suntee * | 12 | 83.33% |
| 141 | Khoo, Aik Seng | 12 | 75.00% |
| 142 | Wong, Freddy Chun Sung * | 12 | 73.21% |
| 143 | Sundarakalin, Punthorn * | 12 | 72.61% |
| 144 | Ho, Maximilian * | 12 | 71.42% |
| 145 | Lau, Sam Lei Kang | 12 | 69.52% |
| 146 | Yong Keat, Lee * | 12 | 69.04% |
| 147 | li, fabien Yi * | 12 | 67.00% |
| 148 | Li, Jie | 12 | 66.66% |
| 149 | Leong, Joseph Kin Seng * | 12 | 64.96% |
| 150 | Lau, Wilfred * | 12 | 64.89% |
| 151 | Nakamura, Shuuhei | 12 | 64.28% |
| 152 | Thio, Russell | 12 | 64.28% |
| 153 | xu, su | 12 | 64.28% |
| 154 | Chan, Qin Liang * | 12 | 62.92% |
| 155 | Lin, Ruizi * | 12 | 61.22% |
| 156 | Yeo, Lee Chye * | 12 | 60.71% |
| 157 | Lim, Tae-hyun * | 12 | 59.75% |
| 158 | Goh, Sean Luke * | 12 | 59.18% |
| 159 | Teo, Yi Chiang | 12 | 59.04% |
| 160 | Tay, Yi Lu * | 12 | 58.50% |
| 161 | Tay, Yong Wei Ralph * | 12 | 58.43% |
| 162 | Ong, Desmond Wei Liang * | 12 | 58.16% |
| 163 | Chong, Fong Kai * | 12 | 58.16% |
| 164 | Soh, Weng Heng | 12 | 57.53% |
| 165 | Lee, Jin Hui Edmund * | 12 | 57.41% |
| 166 | Gwee, Hong Kiat Kenneth * | 12 | 57.14% |
| 167 | Chia, Bing Hong * | 12 | 56.73% |
| 168 | Ching, Yu Jun Jonathan * | 12 | 56.46% |
| 169 | Gan, Huai Shi * | 12 | 55.78% |
| 170 | Zee, Way Leong | 12 | 55.61% |
| 171 | Pong, Robin Hee Tee | 12 | 55.55% |
| 172 | Lim, Guan Ling David * | 12 | 55.37% |
| 173 | Huang, Benjamin | 12 | 55.23% |
| 174 | Tan, Jasper Ming Yuan * | 12 | 54.76% |
| 175 | Chan, ZhongHan Jonathan * | 12 | 54.73% |
| 176 | Ahmad, Jufri * | 12 | 54.69% |
| 177 | Loh, Ryan * | 12 | 54.42% |
| 178 | Dayag, Henry * | 12 | 54.42% |
| 179 | Yu, Mingyi * | 12 | 54.42% |
| 180 | Kok, Kim Yin | 12 | 53.70% |
| 181 | Tan, Chin Heng * | 12 | 53.06% |
| 182 | Teo, Boon Peng * | 12 | 53.06% |
| 183 | Wong, Samson | 12 | 52.72% |
| 184 | Chung, Ian Wai Ming * | 12 | 52.38% |
| 185 | Punpuing, Paopun * | 12 | 52.06% |
| 186 | tan, xingyong * | 12 | 51.19% |
| 187 | lee, timothy * | 12 | 50.68% |
| 188 | Tong, Jing Yao * | 12 | 50.34% |
| 189 | Wong Pu Siong, Alex * | 12 | 49.93% |
| 190 | Ng, Jun Yuan * | 12 | 49.60% |
| 191 | Eng, Boon Tat Elvin | 12 | 48.41% |
| 192 | Lee, Jason Lay Boon | 12 | 48.29% |
| 193 | Chan, Weng Cheong Samuel * | 12 | 47.95% |
| 194 | Hio, Man Tung Lester * | 12 | 47.95% |
| 195 | Yu, Zhaowei * | 12 | 47.61% |
| 196 | Chong, Yi Da * | 12 | 47.61% |
| 197 | Sutthisakorn, Channarong * | 12 | 46.25% |
| 198 | pang, edwin Tian Xiang * | 12 | 45.80% |
| 199 | Teo, Justin * | 12 | 43.53% |
| 200 | Soh, Chia Xiong * | 12 | 43.19% |
| 201 | Chai, Minji * | 12 | 42.85% |
| 202 | Sim, Chun Hung Anthony * | 12 | 42.17% |
| 203 | Koh, Chong Yew Edwin * | 12 | 41.49% |
| 204 | Ng, Kay Wee * | 12 | 34.69% |
| 205 | Lin, Ming Shian * | 11 | 65.07% |
| 206 | Starrs, Sean * | 11 | 58.16% |
| 207 | Kiu, Si Wei Desmond * | 11 | 57.59% |
| 208 | Goh, Chris Si Wei * | 11 | 55.78% |
| 209 | Hung, Hsun Hao * | 11 | 53.96% |
| 210 | Wang, Sim Loong | 11 | 51.11% |
| 211 | Orsuwan, Sutthisak * | 11 | 45.50% |
| 212 | Wong, Nicholas Jonathan | 10 | 62.03% |
| 213 | Zhang, Qun * | 10 | 61.90% |
| 214 | Gan, Chun Fung * | 10 | 58.88% |
| 215 | Piamrasri, Chomron * | 10 | 58.16% |
| 216 | Potter, Michael * | 10 | 57.40% |
| 217 | Lam, chi kwong * | 10 | 56.46% |
| 218 | Yang, Joshua | 10 | 55.32% |
| 219 | Chen, Yenh-Hau | 10 | 55.15% |
| 220 | Cher, Chin Wee | 10 | 54.62% |
| 221 | Lim, Swee Weng * | 10 | 50.45% |
| 222 | Lim, Sidney Ming Han Reube * | 10 | 50.18% |
| 223 | Toh, woon Seong * | 10 | 49.65% |
| 224 | Ng, Benson * | 10 | 49.43% |
| 225 | Wong, Choon Hong Ronald * | 10 | 48.97% |
| 226 | Schuette, Soeren * | 10 | 48.14% |
| 227 | Uttisen, Patwikorn * | 10 | 47.61% |
| 228 | Loh, Martin * | 10 | 47.27% |
| 229 | Yung, Yung * | 10 | 40.13% |
| 230 | Hao, Feng * | 10 | 38.77% |
| 231 | Li, Cheuk Yin * | 9 | 72.22% |
| 232 | Wang, Tian | 9 | 71.11% |
| 233 | Gaku, Hasegawa * | 9 | 67.85% |
| 234 | Jen, Chien-Ming | 9 | 67.85% |
| 235 | Watabe, Naoto * | 9 | 66.66% |
| 236 | Chung, Villien Yaw Fui * | 9 | 61.90% |
| 237 | Kwan, David Wei Phang | 9 | 59.25% |
| 238 | Tan, David Boon Leong * | 9 | 59.25% |
| 239 | Koo, Andy * | 9 | 59.18% |
| 240 | chia, edmund * | 9 | 58.33% |
| 241 | Teo, kaiwen * | 9 | 57.40% |
| 242 | Loh, Wei Wen * | 9 | 56.66% |
| 243 | Chua, Boon Kiat James * | 9 | 56.46% |
| 244 | Xiao, Dennis Ting Bin * | 9 | 56.12% |
| 245 | Loh, Chuan Han | 9 | 56.08% |
| 246 | Ching, Jian Hong * | 9 | 56.05% |
| 247 | Ng, Gene Jian Jie * | 9 | 55.10% |
| 248 | Ho, Yong Jian * | 9 | 54.81% |
| 249 | Chua, David | 9 | 54.44% |
| 250 | Zhang, Tian Hao * | 9 | 54.42% |
| 251 | Ching, Chao Chyvn Charles * | 9 | 54.42% |
| 252 | Hiu, Choon Pien * | 9 | 53.74% |
| 253 | Phungprachit, Pulperm * | 9 | 53.67% |
| 254 | Wu, Sebestian * | 9 | 53.40% |
| 255 | Kwek, Alfie * | 9 | 52.77% |
| 256 | Ryo, Takada * | 9 | 52.72% |
| 257 | Koh, Zhi-Ti Jason * | 9 | 52.65% |
| 258 | Lim, Ke You * | 9 | 52.38% |
| 259 | Neo, Benjamin * | 9 | 50.00% |
| 260 | Rosmarudin, Md Faizal Bin * | 9 | 49.25% |
| 261 | Lim, Leslie * | 9 | 48.97% |
| 262 | Neo, Jarred Chye Heng * | 9 | 48.75% |
| 263 | Ng, bob Yeong Siang * | 9 | 48.29% |
| 264 | su, Jee-hung * | 9 | 48.29% |
| 265 | Yong, Woei * | 9 | 47.95% |
| 266 | Poh, Ming Jie Audric * | 9 | 47.61% |
| 267 | Wong, Hon Choon * | 9 | 47.40% |
| 268 | Neo, Hong Zhi * | 9 | 47.39% |
| 269 | Gan, Jonathan Zheng Sheng * | 9 | 47.22% |
| 270 | Lim, Jun Guang Wilfred * | 9 | 46.53% |
| 271 | Tan, Han Nygel * | 9 | 45.57% |
| 272 | Lim, Shi Cheng James * | 9 | 45.37% |
| 273 | Sng, Kim Guan * | 9 | 44.48% |
| 274 | Yee, Chin Keng * | 9 | 44.21% |
| 275 | Koh, Shao Hong * | 9 | 43.58% |
| 276 | Chua, Rodger Meng Wan * | 9 | 43.53% |
| 277 | Foong, WenJun * | 9 | 42.85% |
| 278 | Hendriks Franssen, Sven * | 9 | 42.85% |
| 279 | Ong, Wei Bin * | 9 | 42.72% |
| 280 | Ng, Chin Pin * | 9 | 42.44% |
| 281 | Wong, Ming Fook * | 9 | 41.95% |
| 282 | Chong, Qi Da * | 9 | 41.76% |
| 283 | Yap, Marcus * | 9 | 40.81% |
| 284 | Wu, JunYu * | 9 | 39.45% |
| 285 | Neo, Alvin Wee Kian * | 9 | 39.04% |
| 286 | Yeo, Melvin * | 8 | 53.70% |
| 287 | Wu, Yang San * | 8 | 45.37% |
| 288 | Puri, Karan * | 8 | 44.44% |
| 289 | Chai, Eng Chye * | 7 | 52.49% |
| 290 | Loo, Ching Siong * | 7 | 50.00% |
| 291 | Low, Kah Yuan * | 7 | 49.65% |
| 292 | Tan, Wei Sau Johnathan * | 7 | 48.97% |
| 293 | Siagian, Yohannes | 7 | 45.23% |
| 294 | Ng, Wai Kwong Victor * | 7 | 44.55% |
| 295 | cheong, Kevin * | 7 | 44.55% |
| 296 | Lin, Yi Chao * | 7 | 42.63% |
| 297 | Teo, Chun Min * | 7 | 42.17% |
| 298 | Nyew, Yee Leong * | 7 | 41.33% |
| 299 | Toy, WenDa * | 7 | 40.92% |
| 300 | Chen, SiHao * | 7 | 40.81% |
| 301 | Chen, Quan Sheng * | 7 | 40.47% |
| 302 | Soon, Kenny * | 7 | 39.90% |
| 303 | Emuang, Bradley Keith * | 7 | 37.96% |
| 304 | Soon Kuan, Saw | 6 | 66.66% |
| 305 | Tjandra, Miki * | 6 | 62.58% |
| 306 | Chan, Boon Hao * | 6 | 58.33% |
| 307 | Seow, Chun Jie * | 6 | 57.40% |
| 308 | Wong, Jeff * | 6 | 57.33% |
| 309 | Woo, Chung Leong Jason * | 6 | 55.78% |
| 310 | gan, meng san * | 6 | 54.16% |
| 311 | Tan, Han Lin * | 6 | 53.33% |
| 312 | Ho, Ming Gen * | 6 | 52.96% |
| 313 | Tan, Victor * | 6 | 52.77% |
| 314 | Ong, Wei Kuan * | 6 | 51.36% |
| 315 | Fan, Kah Ping Nelson * | 6 | 50.92% |
| 316 | Effendi, Yopi | 6 | 50.66% |
| 317 | Huang, Spencer * | 6 | 50.66% |
| 318 | Kang, Wei Xiong * | 6 | 50.00% |
| 319 | Torres, Danielle Paul * | 6 | 49.65% |
| 320 | Goh, Yong Xin * | 6 | 49.33% |
| 321 | Okada, Kou | 6 | 49.33% |
| 322 | Tan, Kek Chin * | 6 | 48.41% |
| 323 | Kuek, Hong Feng Adrian * | 6 | 48.29% |
| 324 | Tse, Desmond * | 6 | 46.98% |
| 325 | Li, HongZeng Kelvin * | 6 | 46.66% |
| 326 | Hartanto, Victor * | 6 | 46.66% |
| 327 | Chong, Yu Terng Aidrich * | 6 | 46.25% |
| 328 | Bay, Ee Yong Dennis * | 6 | 45.85% |
| 329 | Tan, Kah Wei * | 6 | 45.57% |
| 330 | Chan, Zhi Hung * | 6 | 45.17% |
| 331 | Lai, Yong Sheng * | 6 | 43.53% |
| 332 | Kim, Cynic * | 6 | 43.51% |
| 333 | Tan, Wee Cheng * | 6 | 41.49% |
| 334 | Chong, David Tian Wei * | 6 | 39.45% |
| 335 | Cho, Zheng Heng * | 6 | 39.04% |
| 336 | Toh, Qing Yao * | 6 | 37.95% |
| 337 | Sutanto, Hendrew * | 6 | 37.00% |
| 338 | Tiong, Joe * | 5 | 42.66% |
| 339 | Widjaja, Rudy | 4 | 58.33% |
| 340 | Tan, Chee Chong * | 4 | 45.37% |
| 341 | Ang, Dun Jiu * | 4 | 44.44% |
| 342 | Tan, Eng Giap * | 4 | 43.87% |
| 343 | Dwiputra, Arifirawan * | 4 | 41.33% |
| 344 | Neo, Wee Kang Daniel * | 4 | 40.81% |
| 345 | Pek, Dennis Sik Haam * | 3 | 62.50% |
| 346 | Ng, Wei Lee | 3 | 60.41% |
| 347 | Tan, Kiat Cheong * | 3 | 58.33% |
| 348 | Li, chi lung * | 3 | 58.33% |
| 349 | Mogi, Ray * | 3 | 58.33% |
| 350 | Rangsan, Janrangsee * | 3 | 53.33% |
| 351 | Riphat, Aziz * | 3 | 50.00% |
| 352 | Tan, Wee Cher * | 3 | 49.20% |
| 353 | Liew, Gabriel Wei Sheng * | 3 | 47.22% |
| 354 | New, Chee Wee * | 3 | 45.83% |
| 355 | Tan, Kah Beng * | 3 | 45.37% |
| 356 | Chen, Yun Xiang * | 3 | 44.55% |
| 357 | Ang, Joo Chuan Jilson * | 3 | 44.00% |
| 358 | Chong, Daniel Tian Nian * | 3 | 41.83% |
| 359 | Goh, Kian Hou Gerald * | 3 | 40.00% |
| 360 | Hon, Chun Wah * | 3 | 39.79% |
| 361 | Tan, Wee Meng * | 3 | 39.72% |
| 362 | Kee, Zhen Hui * | 3 | 38.88% |
| 363 | Goh, Wee Teck Jerry * | 3 | 37.50% |
| 364 | Lee, Guan Heng * | 1 | 47.91% |
| 365 | Weng, Rong Can * | 1 | 42.66% |
| 366 | Bai, Yixiang * | 1 | 37.50% |
| 367 | Salleh, Fuad * | 0 | 100.00% |
| 368 | Lin, WeiDe * | 0 | 55.55% |
| 369 | Ooi, Wei Jie Andrew * | 0 | 44.44% |
| 370 | Goh, Wu Chong * | 0 | 42.66% |
| 371 | Tan, Keng Wee Samuel * | 0 | 41.66% |
| 372 | Lin, Rui Feng * | 0 | 41.66% |
| 373 | Tan, Jinn Yeong Kelvin * | 0 | 36.05% |
Articles