| Rank | Player | Points | Op.Win% |
| 1 | Leong, Akuma Ding Yuen | 31 | 70.4586% |
| 2 | Law, Albertus Hui Chin | 31 | 69.5326% |
| 3 | Kwan, David | 31 | 64.9055% |
| 4 | Hoon, Kelvin Yew Teck | 30 | 71.8615% |
| 5 | Onoda, Michihisa | 30 | 67.9012% |
| 6 | Cher, Nick * | 29 | 59.4769% |
| 7 | Chai, Royce Ming Huang | 28 | 69.6032% |
| 8 | Yeong, Lance, Chin Wei | 28 | 68.3730% |
| 9 | Chua, Chang * | 28 | 63.7125% |
| 10 | Toh, Eng Hua Adrian * | 28 | 62.0100% |
| 11 | Kwan, Jarrod Tuck Fatt * | 28 | 59.3915% |
| 12 | Chiang, Kang Nien | 27 | 69.6208% |
| 13 | Ang, Jun Yang | 27 | 63.4480% |
| 14 | Tan, Rou Ji Steven * | 27 | 63.2035% |
| 15 | Huang, Lu * | 27 | 62.2575% |
| 16 | Ong, Kok Seng * | 27 | 61.9048% |
| 17 | Ong, Alex Tian Bao | 26 | 65.1190% |
| 18 | Tan, Chuen Hwa | 25 | 71.0758% |
| 19 | Lau, Sam | 25 | 70.8554% |
| 20 | Wang, Sim Loong | 25 | 70.2381% |
| 21 | Ishida, Itaru | 25 | 67.8571% |
| 22 | Soh, Ryan Siong Huat | 25 | 67.1717% |
| 23 | Tan, Allen * | 25 | 64.2857% |
| 24 | Soh, Terry * | 25 | 62.9149% |
| 25 | Yeh, Chao Lung * | 25 | 61.7043% |
| 26 | Murakami, Yuki | 25 | 60.9921% |
| 27 | Tachasukjai, Mongkol | 25 | 58.3911% |
| 28 | Zee, Way Leong * | 25 | 57.7627% |
| 29 | Okamoto, Jin | 24 | 69.3254% |
| 30 | Lin, Bao Qiang | 24 | 68.9153% |
| 31 | Zhang, Ning * | 24 | 68.3422% |
| 32 | Chua, Richie * | 24 | 63.8672% |
| 33 | Au Yong, Wai Kin | 24 | 63.6243% |
| 34 | Chang, Jesse Chih-Hsiang | 24 | 62.5180% |
| 35 | Chua, David * | 24 | 59.8773% |
| 36 | Okada, Ko | 24 | 58.3333% |
| 37 | Higaki, Takao | 24 | 58.2143% |
| 38 | Zhou, Yujian | 23 | 69.5238% |
| 39 | Wang, Xiao | 23 | 66.6667% |
| 40 | KRISH, RONDY * | 23 | 57.6389% |
| 41 | Yuen, Kwan Ching * | 22 | 66.9753% |
| 42 | Leong, Felix | 22 | 65.0463% |
| 43 | Chua, Daniel Boon Hwee * | 22 | 60.0088% |
| 44 | Lee, Andrew * | 22 | 58.8745% |
| 45 | Lin, Milton Jian Xiong | 22 | 56.9690% |
| 46 | Santudpan, Booncherd * | 22 | 56.9264% |
| 47 | Hendrick, Paul Jo-el * | 21 | 65.9722% |
| 48 | Yuliadinata, Dennis * | 21 | 65.5844% |
| 49 | Tham, Tishen | 21 | 64.0079% |
| 50 | Jiang, Yixiang * | 21 | 63.8233% |
| 51 | Tong, King Yim Kingston | 21 | 63.6684% |
| 52 | Kageyama, Taro | 21 | 62.6984% |
| 53 | Udomratta, Suttiporn * | 21 | 62.2520% |
| 54 | Gan, Meng San * | 21 | 61.8607% |
| 55 | Wesley, Ng W. | 19 | 64.5635% |
| 56 | Sianghio, Michael * | 19 | 63.3929% |
| 57 | Jirapongtr, Boonchai * | 19 | 60.1732% |
| 58 | Lin, Gordon | 19 | 57.6659% |
| 59 | Wong, Kok Ming * | 19 | 57.1068% |
| 60 | Ng, Yeong Siang Bob * | 18 | 62.8638% |
| 61 | Pong, Robin Hee Tee | 18 | 62.1212% |
| 62 | Santudpanit, Vichan * | 18 | 55.8201% |
| 63 | Ng, Song Khim | 16 | 67.3641% |
| 64 | Wong, Samson Siew Pui | 15 | 65.6548% |
| 65 | Sirilertvorakul, Veerapat * | 15 | 60.5442% |
| 66 | Adrianto, Felix * | 15 | 60.5442% |
| 67 | Kiu, David D * | 15 | 60.3175% |
| 68 | Ng, Alvin * | 15 | 60.3175% |
| 69 | Chao, Peter | 15 | 60.0000% |
| 70 | Ng, Soon Lye | 15 | 60.0000% |
| 71 | Ahmad, Muhammad Jufri * | 15 | 59.8639% |
| 72 | Siew, Wei Quan * | 15 | 59.1837% |
| 73 | Alvarez, Edsel R. * | 15 | 58.8435% |
| 74 | Gan, Jeff Chun Fung * | 15 | 57.8231% |
| 75 | Chua, Eric * | 15 | 57.4830% |
| 76 | Feleo, Anthony * | 15 | 57.1429% |
| 77 | Tan, Gui Ping Gary * | 15 | 55.7823% |
| 78 | Toh, Gerald Bao Cheng * | 15 | 55.1020% |
| 79 | Chan, Jonathan | 15 | 49.5238% |
| 80 | Loh, Chuan Han * | 15 | 47.9592% |
| 81 | Sng, Meng Hou * | 15 | 46.9388% |
| 82 | Low, Donny | 14 | 77.3810% |
| 83 | Hsu, Aric | 14 | 51.5873% |
| 84 | Opaskit, Piyamate * | 13 | 75.3968% |
| 85 | Kristianto, Donny | 13 | 70.2381% |
| 86 | Giap, Kevin Khoo S. | 13 | 66.6667% |
| 87 | Jackson, Chris H | 13 | 59.5238% |
| 88 | Lee, Julian Wen Yi * | 13 | 58.5034% |
| 89 | Ng, Benjamin Jin K * | 13 | 57.9365% |
| 90 | Tan, Kiat Cheong * | 13 | 57.4603% |
| 91 | Sim, Terence Seng Puay * | 13 | 53.7415% |
| 92 | Hartanto, Wiyono * | 13 | 52.6531% |
| 93 | Tiong, Chris Chuah Huat * | 13 | 49.6599% |
| 94 | Prasitthikul, Siam * | 13 | 48.9796% |
| 95 | Eng, Ching Seng Sam * | 12 | 82.1429% |
| 96 | Wong, Nicholas Jonathan | 12 | 77.1429% |
| 97 | Mok, Bernard Wee Yong * | 12 | 75.2381% |
| 98 | Guerrero, Ogie E * | 12 | 73.0159% |
| 99 | Chang, Mark J. | 12 | 71.4286% |
| 100 | Yang, Zhi Jian Joshua * | 12 | 70.8333% |
| 101 | Petersen, Granger E | 12 | 67.8571% |
| 102 | Wong, Michael T. W. * | 12 | 67.2619% |
| 103 | Huang, Yong Ming * | 12 | 66.2585% |
| 104 | Ho, Chee Yin * | 12 | 66.0714% |
| 105 | Kwong, Aw Y Weng | 12 | 65.7143% |
| 106 | Wye, Tang Mun * | 12 | 65.4762% |
| 107 | Ando, Reiji | 12 | 65.0794% |
| 108 | Wijaya, Vidianto * | 12 | 64.2857% |
| 109 | Widjaja, Rudy | 12 | 64.2857% |
| 110 | Sng, Eugene Yee Gin * | 12 | 60.5442% |
| 111 | Sim, Chapman Wee Yi * | 12 | 60.5442% |
| 112 | Wen, Terence Disheng * | 12 | 59.8639% |
| 113 | Choi, Kwok Keong * | 12 | 59.5238% |
| 114 | Lim, Leslie * | 12 | 59.3197% |
| 115 | Lim, Jimmy Chun Long * | 12 | 59.1837% |
| 116 | Seng, Pang Hon * | 12 | 58.7302% |
| 117 | Thong, Martin * | 12 | 58.5034% |
| 118 | Lin, Jiahao * | 12 | 56.4626% |
| 119 | Tan, Steve Wei Quan * | 12 | 56.3492% |
| 120 | Ong, Terence * | 12 | 54.3651% |
| 121 | Ramos, Miguel * | 12 | 54.0136% |
| 122 | Chean, Cheah Bing * | 12 | 53.9683% |
| 123 | Tang, Wen Yong * | 12 | 53.0612% |
| 124 | Chiu, Jonathan * | 12 | 52.3810% |
| 125 | Ching, Andrew * | 12 | 52.2449% |
| 126 | Tan, Choon Yan * | 12 | 51.7007% |
| 127 | Pang, Chee Kong * | 12 | 51.3605% |
| 128 | Tay, Eric Wei Li * | 12 | 51.3605% |
| 129 | Goh, Lionel Yong Sheng * | 12 | 51.0204% |
| 130 | Ho, Chuan Calwin * | 12 | 50.3401% |
| 131 | LIM, CHIN SHIONG, DAVID * | 12 | 50.3401% |
| 132 | LIM, MENG FEI * | 12 | 50.3401% |
| 133 | Chee, Jia Hui * | 12 | 49.9320% |
| 134 | Lin, Jinyi M * | 12 | 49.6599% |
| 135 | Cheah, Chuen Sheong * | 12 | 49.3197% |
| 136 | Hanshen, Tham * | 12 | 49.2063% |
| 137 | Sim, Kevin * | 12 | 48.9796% |
| 138 | Wong, James Ling Guan * | 12 | 48.7302% |
| 139 | Lee, Cheng Ta * | 12 | 48.6395% |
| 140 | Low, Peng Kuan, Gavin * | 12 | 47.6190% |
| 141 | LIM, CHENG YUAN * | 12 | 46.2585% |
| 142 | Fong, Yu Mun Clement * | 12 | 44.8980% |
| 143 | Lim, Jeffrey * | 12 | 44.8980% |
| 144 | Sim, Qi Zhi, Cedric * | 12 | 44.2177% |
| 145 | Goh, Keng Hwang * | 12 | 42.8571% |
| 146 | Hua, Cheng * | 12 | 42.1769% |
| 147 | Lai, Collin Chun Min * | 12 | 41.4966% |
| 148 | Tan, Keng An , Kayne * | 12 | 40.8163% |
| 149 | Goh, Wee Teck * | 11 | 61.2245% |
| 150 | Yap, Tsiang Ming Clifford | 11 | 60.3175% |
| 151 | Teo, Yi Chiang * | 11 | 51.8367% |
| 152 | Kumar, Sashi * | 11 | 45.5782% |
| 153 | Koh, Fu Yong Jason * | 11 | 40.8163% |
| 154 | Fu, Kenneth Shi Hong * | 11 | 38.0952% |
| 155 | Ng, Wei Lee | 10 | 65.7143% |
| 156 | Khoo, Aik Seng * | 10 | 60.7143% |
| 157 | Choy, Edward C. Keng * | 10 | 60.0000% |
| 158 | Santudpanich, Wiwat * | 10 | 52.0370% |
| 159 | Loh, Yan Ming, Raymond * | 10 | 50.7937% |
| 160 | Ee, Hock Chuan Darren * | 10 | 48.9796% |
| 161 | Low, Derrick Thiah * | 10 | 46.9388% |
| 162 | Yip, Kai Lup Bruno * | 10 | 43.5374% |
| 163 | Wong, Carl * | 10 | 43.1293% |
| 164 | Lee, Yen Chang | 9 | 83.3333% |
| 165 | Teh, Soon Leong * | 9 | 77.7778% |
| 166 | Zhang, Qun * | 9 | 66.6667% |
| 167 | Chenarak, Wattanachai * | 9 | 66.6667% |
| 168 | Wirawan, Ronny * | 9 | 64.2857% |
| 169 | Zhu, Benjamin | 9 | 64.2857% |
| 170 | Ahamad Kamal, Ahmad Omar B * | 9 | 63.8889% |
| 171 | Lim, Yong Zhi , Benjamin * | 9 | 60.2041% |
| 172 | Cheow, Edmund Boon Whye * | 9 | 59.8639% |
| 173 | Siagian, Yohannes P | 9 | 59.7222% |
| 174 | Lee, Keng Yin * | 9 | 59.5238% |
| 175 | Choo, Qinfu , Daniel * | 9 | 58.5034% |
| 176 | Leow, Hong Jin * | 9 | 57.1429% |
| 177 | LEE, ZHI YUAN * | 9 | 57.1429% |
| 178 | Ang, Guo Wei * | 9 | 57.1429% |
| 179 | Toh, Chun Zheng * | 9 | 56.8027% |
| 180 | THET, ZAW OO * | 9 | 56.7347% |
| 181 | Kang, Gabriel * | 9 | 55.5556% |
| 182 | Tan, Choon Han, Chris * | 9 | 55.5556% |
| 183 | Chung, Wai Ming Ian * | 9 | 55.4422% |
| 184 | Lim, Yew Siong * | 9 | 54.4218% |
| 185 | Ng, Wee Khoon * | 9 | 53.7415% |
| 186 | Tan, Wei Lun, Danny * | 9 | 53.1746% |
| 187 | Ou, Ooi Meng * | 9 | 50.3401% |
| 188 | Loh, Mun Kit * | 9 | 50.3401% |
| 189 | Xiao, Kenneth * | 9 | 50.0000% |
| 190 | Cucas, Wong * | 9 | 49.6599% |
| 191 | Tay, Kevin Hao Wei * | 9 | 49.6599% |
| 192 | Pang, Miao Shen * | 9 | 49.3197% |
| 193 | Toh, Qingyao * | 9 | 49.2517% |
| 194 | Tang, Kang Wei * | 9 | 48.9796% |
| 195 | Soh, Joe * | 9 | 48.8095% |
| 196 | Tan, Gin Sin * | 9 | 47.6190% |
| 197 | Lim, Paul Qi-En * | 9 | 46.2585% |
| 198 | Wibisana, Dipa * | 9 | 46.2585% |
| 199 | Yong, Chang Wei, Stanley * | 9 | 44.8980% |
| 200 | Soh, Weng Heng * | 9 | 44.8980% |
| 201 | SIA, CHING HUI * | 9 | 44.4444% |
| 202 | Ong, Chong Guan ,Nicholas * | 9 | 43.5374% |
| 203 | OH, ZHI FU, WALTER * | 9 | 42.8571% |
| 204 | Khoo, Teng Soon Francis * | 9 | 42.1769% |
| 205 | Keng, Wei Lieh, Willie * | 9 | 41.8367% |
| 206 | Beng, Ong Hong * | 9 | 40.8163% |
| 207 | Tan, Vincent * | 9 | 40.1361% |
| 208 | Kang, Kais Heng, Joey * | 9 | 35.3741% |
| 209 | Eurkittiroj, Arthit * | 8 | 53.5147% |
| 210 | Therrien, Troy * | 8 | 53.3333% |
| 211 | Xie, Reagan Yan Long * | 8 | 47.6190% |
| 212 | Lee, Jing Huei * | 8 | 45.5782% |
| 213 | Hiu, Choon Pien * | 8 | 44.8980% |
| 214 | Foo, Zhi Zhou , Neil * | 8 | 44.2177% |
| 215 | Loo, Yong Hoe * | 8 | 42.8571% |
| 216 | Cheng, Jinhan * | 7 | 48.2993% |
| 217 | Restel, Sven * | 7 | 47.6190% |
| 218 | Ho, Kwee Yan * | 7 | 42.1769% |
| 219 | Cheong, Iw Tong * | 7 | 40.8163% |
| 220 | Chong, Wai Mun * | 6 | 58.6667% |
| 221 | Lee, Beth * | 6 | 56.0000% |
| 222 | Ng, Terence Yui Huang * | 6 | 54.7619% |
| 223 | Yamada, Tsutomu | 6 | 53.3333% |
| 224 | Cheng, Jasper * | 6 | 51.7007% |
| 225 | See, Francis * | 6 | 51.3605% |
| 226 | Ong, Marcus Wen Hao * | 6 | 48.9796% |
| 227 | Ng, Chii Shyan, Richie * | 6 | 47.7551% |
| 228 | Sim, See Quan * | 6 | 47.2789% |
| 229 | Pinto, Julian * | 6 | 47.2109% |
| 230 | Amda, Arifin Bin Ali * | 6 | 46.5306% |
| 231 | Chew, Choon Gee * | 6 | 46.4815% |
| 232 | Ho, Yang * | 6 | 46.2585% |
| 233 | Soh, Jin * | 6 | 45.5782% |
| 234 | Pua, Shi Enn * | 6 | 44.8980% |
| 235 | Pitinusorn, Bovorn * | 6 | 44.5578% |
| 236 | Teo, Jeffrey Puay Hian * | 6 | 44.4444% |
| 237 | Toh, Woon Seong * | 6 | 44.2177% |
| 238 | Byrne, Albert Andrew * | 6 | 44.2177% |
| 239 | Yong, Melvin Hsian-chai * | 6 | 44.0000% |
| 240 | Ng, Chee YongJason * | 6 | 43.8095% |
| 241 | Toh, Xiang Wei * | 6 | 41.6667% |
| 242 | Ong, Lionel Li Sheng * | 6 | 41.4966% |
| 243 | Khoo, Boon Wee * | 6 | 38.3673% |
| 244 | Tan, Zheng Yang * | 5 | 50.6667% |
| 245 | Yeo, Wen Li * | 4 | 55.0000% |
| 246 | Tan, Chee Leong * | 4 | 54.4218% |
| 247 | Singh, Suraj Prakash * | 4 | 48.9796% |
| 248 | Wang, Zhi Bin * | 3 | 58.3333% |
| 249 | Yong, Gordon * | 3 | 58.3333% |
| 250 | PENG, TIE LUN * | 3 | 49.0741% |
| 251 | Wydianto, Franky * | 3 | 46.6667% |
| 252 | Tan, Zi Yang * | 3 | 46.2585% |
| 253 | Tan, Anthony Senfa * | 3 | 45.5782% |
| 254 | Toh, Hu Cheong, Terence * | 3 | 45.5556% |
| 255 | Wong, Ming Fook * | 3 | 43.3107% |
| 256 | Natasastra, Jeffry * | 3 | 41.6667% |
| 257 | LIM, JIN ZE * | 3 | 37.4150% |
| 258 | Hiranyasir, Pongsiri * | 1 | 44.4444% |
| 259 | Tay, Yi Lu * | 0 | 75.0000% |
| 260 | Lee, Chee Kheong Alvin * | 0 | 50.0000% |
| 261 | Muhammad, Syahrul Hisyam * | 0 | 44.4444% |
| 262 | Wibisono, Carlo * | 0 | 44.4444% |
| 263 | Shi, Zhenhao * | 0 | 43.7500% |
| 264 | Seah, Xiang Ming * | 0 | 41.6667% |
| 265 | KONG, HONG HIN, BENJAMIN * | 0 | 36.0544% |
| 266 | Chan, Adam * | 0 | 33.3333% |
Articles