| Rank | Player | Points | Op.Win% |
| 66 | Adrianto, Felix | 15 | 60.54% |
| 170 | Ahamad Kamal, Ahmad Omar B. | 9 | 63.88% |
| 71 | Ahmad, Muhammad Jufri | 15 | 59.86% |
| 73 | Alvarez, Edsel R. | 15 | 58.84% |
| 230 | Amda, Arifin Bin Ali | 6 | 46.53% |
| 107 | Ando, Reiji | 12 | 65.07% |
| 178 | Ang, Guo Wei | 9 | 57.14% |
| 48 | Ang, Jun Yang | 18 | 64.77% |
| 42 | Au Yong, Wai Kin | 18 | 67.81% |
| 206 | Beng, Ong Hong | 9 | 40.81% |
| 238 | Byrne, Albert Andrew | 6 | 44.21% |
| 2 | Chai, Ming Huang, Royce | 24 | 76.41% |
| 266 | Chan, Adam | 0 | 33.33% |
| 79 | Chan, Jonathan | 15 | 49.52% |
| 41 | Chang, Jesse Chih-Hsiang | 18 | 68.02% |
| 99 | Chang, Mark J. | 12 | 71.42% |
| 69 | Chao, Peter | 15 | 60.00% |
| 135 | Cheah, Chuen Sheong | 12 | 49.31% |
| 122 | Chean, Cheah Bing | 12 | 53.96% |
| 133 | Chee, Jia Hui | 12 | 49.93% |
| 167 | Chenarak, Wattanachai | 9 | 66.66% |
| 224 | Cheng, Jasper | 6 | 51.70% |
| 216 | Cheng, Jinhan | 7 | 48.29% |
| 219 | Cheong, Iw Tong | 7 | 40.81% |
| 172 | Cheow, Edmund Boon Whye | 9 | 59.86% |
| 12 | Cher, Nick | 22 | 58.48% |
| 231 | Chew, Choon Gee | 6 | 46.48% |
| 17 | Chiang, Kang Nien | 21 | 72.48% |
| 125 | Ching, Andrew | 12 | 52.24% |
| 124 | Chiu, Jonathan | 12 | 52.38% |
| 113 | Choi, Kwok Keong | 12 | 59.52% |
| 220 | Chong, Wai Mun | 6 | 58.66% |
| 175 | Choo, Qinfu , Daniel | 9 | 58.50% |
| 157 | Choy, Edward C. Keng | 10 | 60.00% |
| 35 | Chua, Chang | 19 | 62.08% |
| 21 | Chua, Daniel Boon Hwee | 21 | 65.16% |
| 25 | Chua, David | 21 | 57.91% |
| 75 | Chua, Eric | 15 | 57.48% |
| 60 | Chua, Richie | 15 | 69.69% |
| 183 | Chung, Wai Ming Ian | 9 | 55.44% |
| 190 | Cucas, Wong | 9 | 49.65% |
| 160 | Ee, Hock Chuan Darren | 10 | 48.97% |
| 95 | Eng, Ching Seng Sam | 12 | 82.14% |
| 209 | Eurkittiroj, Arthit | 8 | 53.51% |
| 76 | Feleo, Anthony | 15 | 57.14% |
| 142 | Fong, Yu Mun Clement | 12 | 44.89% |
| 214 | Foo, Zhi Zhou , Neil | 8 | 44.21% |
| 154 | Fu, Kenneth Shi Hong | 11 | 38.09% |
| 74 | Gan, Jeff Chun Fung | 15 | 57.82% |
| 45 | Gan, Meng San | 18 | 66.40% |
| 86 | Giap, Kevin Khoo S. | 13 | 66.66% |
| 145 | Goh, Keng Hwang | 12 | 42.85% |
| 129 | Goh, Lionel Yong Sheng | 12 | 51.02% |
| 149 | Goh, Wee Teck | 11 | 61.22% |
| 98 | Guerrero, Ogie E | 12 | 73.01% |
| 136 | Hanshen, Tham | 12 | 49.20% |
| 92 | Hartanto, Wiyono | 13 | 52.65% |
| 18 | Hendrick, Paul Jo-el | 21 | 69.13% |
| 63 | Higaki, Takao | 15 | 62.66% |
| 258 | Hiranyasir, Pongsiri | 1 | 44.44% |
| 213 | Hiu, Choon Pien | 8 | 44.89% |
| 104 | Ho, Chee Yin | 12 | 66.07% |
| 130 | Ho, Chuan Calwin | 12 | 50.34% |
| 218 | Ho, Kwee Yan | 7 | 42.17% |
| 232 | HO, YANG | 6 | 46.25% |
| 3 | Hoon, Kelvin Yew Teck | 24 | 76.12% |
| 83 | Hsu, Aric | 14 | 51.58% |
| 146 | Hua, Cheng | 12 | 42.17% |
| 23 | Huang, Lu | 21 | 62.83% |
| 103 | HUANG, YONG MING | 12 | 66.25% |
| 10 | Ishida, Itaru | 22 | 65.52% |
| 87 | Jackson, Chris H | 13 | 59.52% |
| 53 | Jiang, Yixiang | 17 | 66.07% |
| 58 | Jirapongtr, Boonchai | 16 | 60.78% |
| 44 | Kageyama, Taro | 18 | 67.34% |
| 181 | Kang, Gabriel | 9 | 55.55% |
| 208 | Kang, Kais Heng, Joey | 9 | 35.37% |
| 205 | Keng, Wei Lieh, Willie | 9 | 41.83% |
| 156 | Khoo, Aik Seng | 10 | 60.71% |
| 243 | Khoo, Boon Wee | 6 | 38.36% |
| 204 | Khoo, Teng Soon Francis | 9 | 42.17% |
| 67 | Kiu, David D | 15 | 60.31% |
| 153 | Koh, Fu Yong Jason | 11 | 40.81% |
| 265 | KONG, HONG HIN, BENJAMIN | 0 | 36.05% |
| 26 | KRISH, RONDY | 21 | 55.55% |
| 85 | Kristianto, Donny | 13 | 70.23% |
| 152 | Kumar, Sashi | 11 | 45.57% |
| 11 | Kwan, David | 22 | 63.16% |
| 14 | Kwan, Jarrod Tuck Fatt | 22 | 54.49% |
| 105 | Kwong, Aw Y Weng | 12 | 65.71% |
| 147 | Lai, Collin Chun Min | 12 | 41.49% |
| 54 | Lau, Sam | 16 | 73.10% |
| 4 | Law, Albertus Hui Chin | 24 | 71.42% |
| 36 | Lee, Andrew | 19 | 61.50% |
| 221 | Lee, Beth | 6 | 56.00% |
| 260 | Lee, Chee Kheong Alvin | 0 | 50.00% |
| 139 | Lee, Cheng Ta | 12 | 48.63% |
| 212 | Lee, Jing Huei | 8 | 45.57% |
| 88 | Lee, Julian Wen Yi | 13 | 58.50% |
| 174 | Lee, Keng Yin | 9 | 59.52% |
| 164 | Lee, Yen Chang | 9 | 83.33% |
| 177 | LEE, ZHI YUAN | 9 | 57.14% |
| 1 | Leong, Akuma Ding Yuen | 27 | 70.81% |
| 31 | Leong, Felix | 19 | 67.69% |
| 176 | Leow, Hong Jin | 9 | 57.14% |
| 141 | LIM, CHENG YUAN | 12 | 46.25% |
| 131 | LIM, CHIN SHIONG, DAVID | 12 | 50.34% |
| 143 | Lim, Jeffrey | 12 | 44.89% |
| 115 | Lim, Jimmy Chun Long | 12 | 59.18% |
| 257 | LIM, JIN ZE | 3 | 37.41% |
| 114 | Lim, Leslie | 12 | 59.31% |
| 132 | LIM, MENG FEI | 12 | 50.34% |
| 197 | Lim, Paul Qi-En | 9 | 46.25% |
| 184 | Lim, Yew Siong | 9 | 54.42% |
| 171 | Lim, Yong Zhi , Benjamin | 9 | 60.20% |
| 15 | Lin, Bao Qiang | 21 | 75.13% |
| 59 | Lin, Gordon | 16 | 59.97% |
| 118 | Lin, Jiahao | 12 | 56.46% |
| 134 | Lin, Jinyi M | 12 | 49.65% |
| 37 | Lin, Milton Jian Xiong | 19 | 60.58% |
| 80 | Loh, Chuan Han | 15 | 47.95% |
| 188 | Loh, Mun Kit | 9 | 50.34% |
| 159 | Loh, Yan Ming, Raymond | 10 | 50.79% |
| 215 | Loo, Yong Hoe | 8 | 42.85% |
| 161 | Low, Derrick Thiah | 10 | 46.93% |
| 82 | Low, Donny | 14 | 77.38% |
| 140 | Low, Peng Kuan, Gavin | 12 | 47.61% |
| 97 | Mok, Bernard Wee Yong | 12 | 75.23% |
| 261 | Muhammad, Syahrul Hisyam | 0 | 44.44% |
| 49 | Murakami, Yuki | 18 | 64.51% |
| 256 | Natasastra, Jeffry | 3 | 41.66% |
| 68 | Ng, Alvin | 15 | 60.31% |
| 89 | Ng, Benjamin Jin K | 13 | 57.93% |
| 240 | Ng, Chee YongJason | 6 | 43.80% |
| 227 | Ng, Chii Shyan, Richie | 6 | 47.75% |
| 56 | Ng, Song Khim | 16 | 70.78% |
| 70 | Ng, Soon Lye | 15 | 60.00% |
| 222 | Ng, Terence Yui Huang | 6 | 54.76% |
| 185 | Ng, Wee Khoon | 9 | 53.74% |
| 155 | Ng, Wei Lee | 10 | 65.71% |
| 47 | Ng, Yeong Siang Bob | 18 | 64.78% |
| 203 | OH, ZHI FU, WALTER | 9 | 42.85% |
| 64 | Okada, Ko | 15 | 61.72% |
| 7 | Okamoto, Jin | 24 | 65.83% |
| 27 | Ong, Alex Tian Bao | 20 | 66.96% |
| 202 | Ong, Chong Guan ,Nicholas | 9 | 43.53% |
| 50 | Ong, Kok Seng | 18 | 64.46% |
| 242 | Ong, Lionel Li Sheng | 6 | 41.49% |
| 226 | Ong, Marcus Wen Hao | 6 | 48.97% |
| 120 | Ong, Terence | 12 | 54.36% |
| 16 | Onoda, Michihisa | 21 | 73.14% |
| 84 | Opaskit, Piyamate | 13 | 75.39% |
| 187 | Ou, Ooi Meng | 9 | 50.34% |
| 127 | Pang, Chee Kong | 12 | 51.36% |
| 192 | Pang, Miao Shen | 9 | 49.31% |
| 250 | PENG, TIE LUN | 3 | 49.07% |
| 101 | Petersen, Granger E | 12 | 67.85% |
| 229 | Pinto, Julian | 6 | 47.21% |
| 235 | Pitinusorn, Bovorn | 6 | 44.55% |
| 51 | Pong, Robin Hee Tee | 18 | 64.02% |
| 94 | Prasitthikul, Siam | 13 | 48.97% |
| 234 | Pua, Shi Enn | 6 | 44.89% |
| 121 | Ramos, Miguel | 12 | 54.01% |
| 217 | Restel, Sven | 7 | 47.61% |
| 13 | Santudpan, Booncherd | 22 | 55.35% |
| 158 | Santudpanich, Wiwat | 10 | 52.03% |
| 52 | Santudpanit, Vichan | 18 | 55.90% |
| 264 | Seah, Xiang Ming | 0 | 41.66% |
| 225 | See, Francis | 6 | 51.36% |
| 116 | Seng, Pang Hon | 12 | 58.73% |
| 263 | Shi, Zhenhao | 0 | 43.75% |
| 201 | SIA, CHING HUI | 9 | 44.44% |
| 173 | Siagian, Yohannes P | 9 | 59.72% |
| 32 | Sianghio, Michael | 19 | 67.54% |
| 72 | Siew, Wei Quan | 15 | 59.18% |
| 111 | Sim, Chapman Wee Yi | 12 | 60.54% |
| 137 | Sim, Kevin | 12 | 48.97% |
| 144 | Sim, Qi Zhi, Cedric | 12 | 44.21% |
| 228 | Sim, See Quan | 6 | 47.27% |
| 91 | Sim, Terence Seng Puay | 13 | 53.74% |
| 247 | Singh, Suraj Prakash | 4 | 48.97% |
| 65 | Sirilertvorakul, Veerapat | 15 | 60.54% |
| 110 | Sng, Eugene Yee Gin | 12 | 60.54% |
| 81 | Sng, Meng Hou | 15 | 46.93% |
| 233 | Soh, Jin | 6 | 45.57% |
| 195 | Soh, Joe | 9 | 48.80% |
| 9 | Soh, Ryan Siong Huat | 22 | 69.75% |
| 34 | Soh, Terry | 19 | 64.05% |
| 200 | Soh, Weng Heng | 9 | 44.89% |
| 24 | Tachasukjai, Mongkol | 21 | 61.07% |
| 22 | Tan, Allen | 21 | 63.39% |
| 253 | Tan, Anthony Senfa | 3 | 45.57% |
| 246 | Tan, Chee Leong | 4 | 54.42% |
| 182 | Tan, Choon Han, Chris | 9 | 55.55% |
| 126 | Tan, Choon Yan | 12 | 51.70% |
| 8 | Tan, Chuen Hwa | 22 | 72.66% |
| 196 | Tan, Gin Sin | 9 | 47.61% |
| 77 | Tan, Gui Ping Gary | 15 | 55.78% |
| 148 | Tan, Keng An , Kayne | 12 | 40.81% |
| 90 | Tan, Kiat Cheong | 13 | 57.46% |
| 46 | Tan, Rou Ji Steven | 18 | 65.96% |
| 119 | Tan, Steve Wei Quan | 12 | 56.34% |
| 207 | Tan, Vincent | 9 | 40.13% |
| 186 | Tan, Wei Lun, Danny | 9 | 53.17% |
| 244 | Tan, Zheng Yang | 5 | 50.66% |
| 252 | Tan, Zi Yang | 3 | 46.25% |
| 194 | Tang, Kang Wei | 9 | 48.97% |
| 123 | Tang, Wen Yong | 12 | 53.06% |
| 128 | Tay, Eric Wei Li | 12 | 51.36% |
| 191 | Tay, Kevin Hao Wei | 9 | 49.65% |
| 259 | Tay, Yi Lu | 0 | 75.00% |
| 165 | Teh, Soon Leong | 9 | 77.77% |
| 236 | Teo, Jeffrey Puay Hian | 6 | 44.44% |
| 151 | Teo, Yi Chiang | 11 | 51.83% |
| 39 | Tham, Tishen | 18 | 69.61% |
| 210 | Therrien, Troy | 8 | 53.33% |
| 180 | THET, ZAW OO | 9 | 56.73% |
| 117 | Thong, Martin | 12 | 58.50% |
| 93 | Tiong, Chris Chuah Huat | 13 | 49.65% |
| 179 | Toh, Chun Zheng | 9 | 56.80% |
| 33 | Toh, Eng Hua Adrian | 19 | 64.43% |
| 78 | Toh, Gerald Bao Cheng | 15 | 55.10% |
| 254 | Toh, Hu Cheong, Terence | 3 | 45.55% |
| 193 | Toh, Qingyao | 9 | 49.25% |
| 237 | Toh, Woon Seong | 6 | 44.21% |
| 241 | Toh, Xiang Wei | 6 | 41.66% |
| 20 | Tong, King Yim Kingston | 21 | 66.49% |
| 62 | Udomratta, Suttiporn | 15 | 68.34% |
| 5 | Wang, Sim Loong | 24 | 70.18% |
| 29 | Wang, Xiao | 19 | 72.22% |
| 248 | Wang, Zhi Bin | 3 | 58.33% |
| 112 | Wen, Terence Disheng | 12 | 59.86% |
| 55 | Wesley, Ng W. | 16 | 72.78% |
| 198 | Wibisana, Dipa | 9 | 46.25% |
| 262 | Wibisono, Carlo | 0 | 44.44% |
| 109 | Widjaja, Rudy | 12 | 64.28% |
| 108 | Wijaya, Vidianto | 12 | 64.28% |
| 168 | Wirawan, Ronny | 9 | 64.28% |
| 163 | Wong, Carl | 10 | 43.12% |
| 138 | Wong, James Ling Guan | 12 | 48.73% |
| 57 | Wong, Kok Ming | 16 | 62.89% |
| 102 | Wong, Michael T. W. | 12 | 67.26% |
| 255 | Wong, Ming Fook | 3 | 43.31% |
| 96 | Wong, Nicholas Jonathan | 12 | 77.14% |
| 61 | Wong, Samson Siew Pui | 15 | 69.69% |
| 251 | Wydianto, Franky | 3 | 46.66% |
| 106 | Wye, Tang Mun | 12 | 65.47% |
| 189 | Xiao, Kenneth | 9 | 50.00% |
| 211 | Xie, Reagan Yan Long | 8 | 47.61% |
| 223 | Yamada, Tsutomu | 6 | 53.33% |
| 100 | Yang, Zhi Jian Joshua | 12 | 70.83% |
| 150 | Yap, Tsiang Ming Clifford | 11 | 60.31% |
| 43 | Yeh, Chao Lung | 18 | 67.72% |
| 245 | Yeo, Wen Li | 4 | 55.00% |
| 6 | Yeong, Lance, Chin Wei | 24 | 69.76% |
| 162 | Yip, Kai Lup Bruno | 10 | 43.53% |
| 199 | Yong, Chang Wei, Stanley | 9 | 44.89% |
| 249 | Yong, Gordon | 3 | 58.33% |
| 239 | Yong, Melvin Hsian-chai | 6 | 44.00% |
| 28 | Yuen, Kwan Ching | 19 | 73.45% |
| 40 | Yuliadinata, Dennis | 18 | 69.11% |
| 38 | Zee, Way Leong | 19 | 57.73% |
| 19 | Zhang, Ning | 21 | 67.01% |
| 166 | Zhang, Qun | 9 | 66.66% |
| 30 | Zhou, Yujian | 19 | 69.69% |
| 169 | Zhu, Benjamin | 9 | 64.28% |
Articles