The good news is that there will be supplemental Prerelease events at several locations across the Northeast and Midwest this weekend! So if you didn't get to play the first time (heck, even if you did), check the schedule here then head out for a second chance! The ninjas await!
Paul's Betrayers Tidbits
Two weeks ago, Paul Sottosanti put a list of “true or false” statements about the development of Betrayers of Kamigawa into his preview article. Let's take a look at them and see which were true and which were savage lies.
1) A card nicknamed “Plan B” entered development at four mana and made brief stops at six, seven, and eight mana before going to ten due to the efforts of a couple determined playtesters.
The problem wasn't that they'd start the game over fairly by playing Plan B--that would have merely been annoying, and not actually good. Their plan was to start the game unfairly by floating extra mana. For instance, when Plan B cost six, it was pretty easy for Paul to get 11 mana, play Plan B with five mana floating, draw his new hand a put a Molder Slug or some other nasty creature into play. That's hard to stop when you have no permanents and only 7 life. It was kind of like Tooth and Nail and Obliterate all rolled into one.
After much testing, the card was proving unsafe at any reasonable mana cost, but was still cool enough to make. So ten mana it was.
2) For a time there was a Goblin Ninja that required you to sacrifice the attacking creature instead of bringing it back to your hand, but it was killed when Ninjas were removed from Red.
False. Much like how Samurai were put only into certain colors (white, red, and black), Ninjas were concepted as only blue and black from the outset of design. The “Goblin Ninja” was always a joke around R&D, but never actually was in the set.
3) Henry Stern predicted in a meeting, and then in the Multiverse comments, that a certain common 1/1 with an arguably mediocre ability would see play in Block Constructed.
The card in question here is Matsu-Tribe Sniper. The Sniper can keep a Dragon in lockdown pretty much permanently once the Dragon taps (which probably means it hit you once), but the Sniper is so frail that I can't imagine it making an actual impact. Hey, maybe one of you will prove Henry right. It'll be cool.
4) At one point, the Ninjutsu costs in the set were aggressive enough that a deck nicknamed “Ninfinity,” combining an Ornithopter-based Affinity build with a number of cheap Ninjas, was the deck to beat in the FFL.
Half-True, which I guess means false. We did have a “Ninfinity” deck in-house. Ninja of the Deep Hours had Ninjutsu , and Okiba-Gang Shinobi was to play and had Ninjutsu for a good while. On top of that, Shuriken had an equip cost of and was actually demolishing some of our other decks. But while cute and fun, the deck was not as good as normal Ravager Affinity, which is, of course, a good thing. So while Ninfinity was a great deckbuilding exercise that made for some funny stories, it was never the deck to beat around here.
On that note, Shuriken is the only card in the set that I designed, as I was on neither the design team nor the development team. (I know Paul mentioned that he made a few cards, but he's in Japan right now in the Pro Tour, so I can't follow up with him on that. Maybe later.) Shuriken was made to be “top-down” based on what a throwing star would do in Magic. My initial version had the Shuriken going to the opponent no matter what each time it was used. Development added the “Ninja bonus clause,” and that was an awesome tweak.
5) A creature that gave mana acceleration to Blue made it most of the way through development before being dropped in the final stages.
Paul mentioned to me that, with the old ability, the dev team wondered if Mistmaster would have been the best one-mana blue creature of all time. I seem to remember hearing that conversation and vaguely agreeing with it, but now that I look back the answer is a little unclear. Sure, the card would have been somewhat versatile--making mana sometimes, tapping blockers sometimes, and so on--but if a slightly better Blood Pet is the best blue has gotten for one mana EVER, then… well… then blue's one-drops have been historically pretty darn bad. Right now, my vote goes to Flying Men.
In any event, Teardrop Kami is still strictly better than his sad little brothers the Wandering Ones. And while I may not agree that letting him untap anything would have made him the premier blue one-mana creature, I agree with the decision to not give cheap acceleration to that color.
6) The development team, having decided to commit to actually making White Weenie good, added Armageddon as a White rare, but it only lasted a week and a half before negative feedback from playtesters forced it out of the set.
False. While we will always keep making good white weenies (someday the deck will be good again, really… statistically it has to happen, right?), we're still not at the point where we're ready to bring back the big ka-boom. It was never in the set.
7) There's a card in the set that almost died at numerous points because it carried with it the possibility of first turn kills in Standard, but it narrowly survived and still exists today.
True. An easy one. Lots of people have figured out that an opening hand of 2x Blazing Shoal (the card in question), 2x Myojin of Infinite Rage, Mountain, and Raging Goblin can end the game on turn 1. We're okay with that, as it just isn't reliable enough to be scary.
I was and still am scared of Blazing Shoal, however, as I can't shake the feeling that we missed some awesome combo with it in Extended. I hope I'm wrong!
There you have it. Thanks again to Paul for giving me such interesting content!
Things to Know
I've played a bunch of games with Betrayers cards recently, and some common gave situations have come up that may be a little counterintuitive. I'd like to share a couple of my “play secrets” with you to help you use the new cards to their fullest.
The first one involves the card I previewed last week, Shining Shoal. The interesting thing about the Shoal is that it only has one target--the thing you are redirecting the damage to. What it prevents the damage to is chosen on resolution. Plus, if one source is dealing damage to multiple creatures (or a creature and you), you can prevent the damage in whichever was is most beneficial to you.
The other tidbits I have to share involve the Genjus, which have a lot going on even though they seem simple.
A Genju played on a land that has been in play since the beginning of your turn can be activated and attack right away. The land is becoming a creature, and it will not have summoning sickness since it began the turn in play, even though it was just a land at that point.
Conversely, if you play a Genju on a land you just put out earlier in the turn, that land will not be able to attack even if you animate it. Things that came into play this turn cannot attack.
The last note on the Genjus involves a specific interaction--that between a Genju and Kiki-Jiki, Mirror Breaker. Say you activate Genju of the Spires, making a Mountain into a 6/1. You then copy that Mountain with Kiki-Jiki's ability. Is the token a 6/1 creature with haste? No.
The token is a copy of Mountain, with haste. It is a land and can be tapped for mana, but it is not a creature and cannot attack. “Copy effects” copy cards as they are printed. Things like +1/+1 counters, type-changing effects (like the Genju), or temporary effects (like Jump) are not copied. So if you target a Mountain with Kiki-Jiki, regardless of what cool modifications you have made to that Mountain, you will get a token copy of a boring old Mountain, and you'll still have to sacrifice it at the end of the turn.
Last Week's Poll:
|Which group of cards from Betrayers of Kamigawa has you most excited?|