Free Association

Posted in Making Magic on February 5, 2004

By Mark Rosewater

Working in R&D since '95, Mark became Magic head designer in '03. His hobbies: spending time with family, writing about Magic in all mediums, and creating short bios.

One of the common problems for design is that people by nature look for similarities rather than differences when faced with something new. When faced with something new, people try to figure out how that thing is like something they already know. This is extremely true in Magic, particularly with game mechanics.

Take flashback for example. When flashback first came out, everyone wanted to look at it as a retread of buyback. Just like buyback, flashback allowed you to play a spell more than once. In addition, both have “back” in their names. Don't laugh, the similarity of names is very relevant in how players perceive things.

The point of this little story is that it is getting harder and harder to do something “different” in Magic because most new ideas have some connection to something we've already done. This was one of the reasons I was so happy with imprint. It was the one new mechanic that couldn't simply be compared to an old mechanic.











Latest Making Magic Articles

MAKING MAGIC

October 18, 2021

Mechanical Color Pie 2021 by, Mark Rosewater

In 2017, I wrote an article called Mechanical Color Pie 2017 where I listed in detail what effects were in each color. I promised that from time to time I would update this article. Today...

Learn More

MAKING MAGIC

October 18, 2021

Mechanical Color Pie 2021 Changes by, Mark Rosewater

*/ Below is a detailed list of every change I made between my Mechanical Color Pie 2017 article and today's 2021 version. After each change, I will explain what changed and why in a blue...

Learn More

Articles

Articles

Making Magic Archive

Consult the archives for more articles!

See All